Well I guess he was hoping the judge was a democrat.
Typical Democrat thinking.
Joseph Gobrick, a 45-year-old man from Michigan, was found guilty
of possessing pornographic images of children on his computer.
At trial, Gobrick claimed that he was not sexually
attracted to children, despite the overwhelming evidence.
He claimed that he identified as an “8-year-old girl” and that
his possession of child porn was protected under the First Amendment.
Put this freak in with the general population. He’ll certainly be popular with the love starved inmates.
“Gobrick’s case is a stark reminder of the importance of preserving traditional values and upholding the rule of law.”
I’d still say that what this guy did was no worse than the PUBLIC SCHOOL that required their little girls to put on a porn show for a guy, in the girls’ locker room.
POSTER MATERIAL FOR “CREEPY”.
Creepy insane dude
If I were the judge, after hearing that I would’ve ordered the bailiff to march him down front, kneel him down in front of the bench, put a .45 up to his head and pull the trigger right then and there in the courtroom.
Nothing makes me see red than someone who would harm a child, especially then offering up a piss-poor excuse like this animal did.
Make an example out of one of these demonic monsters and the rest of ‘em will get the memo pretty quick.
He identifies as an eight year old girl. There are guys waiting in line for a date with him in prison.
I’m surprised they didn’t hire him at the local school system to read “Heather has two mommies”, or some of the other pornographic books they feed them now days.
This clearly flies in the fsce of current societal morals and psych teachings. We can be anything we want, we just have to identify ourselves as such. Women can identify as men. Men can identify as women. People can identify as animals. Women can marry trees, or themselves. Men can marry cars. Adults can identify as children.
Judge is woefully behind the times and “science”.
This is a story from 2020:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7872033/Convicted-sex-offender-argues-child-porn-stash-legal.html
https://www.wltx.com/article/news/crime/man-sentenced-for-child-sexually-abusive-material/69-7fadc67c-c26e-4a9c-ba51-992caa86caf2#
And yet this is EXACTLY what democrats do and advocate for.
They are truly the party of evil.
What am I missing here? That should have worked. What is wrong with this judge?
The liberal mind is beyond help. There’s no cure, no hope for a cure.
The more insanity we tolerate the more we’ll get. When a sitting Supreme Court judge can’t define what is a woman…
Out the nearest air lock.