In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Labcorp has ramped up FAKE fraudulent Bird Flu tests in the U.S. | the PCR process is not a diagnostic test, but is used to create pandemics on demand. , Brooklyn Attitude wrote: “The assay eliminates the human response to whatever is present. The human response is either illness or health. Presence doesn’t mean ‘illness’ by any definition.”
That’s true, that’s why responsible physicians don’t order PCR tests for people who are not sick or showing symptoms typical of infection with a suspected pathogen. I’m not going to defend the use of PCR for the Covid scamdemic. The guidelines and cycle number the CDC recommended were ridiculous.
That’s true, that’s why responsible physicians don’t order PCR tests for people who are not sick or showing symptoms typical of infection with a suspected pathogen.
The PCR does not indicate cause - it was designed to indicate 'minute existance' in a sample, and if obtained from swabs, it can falsely identify any number of irrelevant pathogens, particularly ones the immune system defeats. Which means it's not a diagnostic tool
When I had 4 months of rib-cracking coughing and went from doctor, to doctor, receiving stronger and stronger prescriptions to the point that the next doctor said I'd gone through all prescriptions below the level of AIDS drugs, and AIDS drugs were next. I could have had a PCR, and a respiratory virus (or two) could have been detected, but whatever viruses an PCR assay could amplify/exaggerate for study, they would not have been the cause of my illness.
I accidentally stumbled upon a pulmonary specialist who told me and didn't need antibiotics, and didn't have an infection. He said my lungs were inflammed and prescribed anti-inflammatory inhalers etc. Problem solved.
So the PCR takes inventory in an exaggerated manner, but does not indicate what caused any collection of symptoms present.
“The PCR does not indicate cause - it was designed to indicate ‘minute existance’ in a sample, and if obtained from swabs, it can falsely identify any number of irrelevant pathogens, particularly ones the immune system defeats.”
By your definition there are no diagnostic tests for microbial infections. The throat is not sterile. There are ALWAYS bacteria there, but when you have an infection the numbers of the pathogen are always MUCH greater than the background. Before PCR, throat swab were used to spread samples onto growth media to see what grew and then identify it and determine what antibiotics (if any) to which it is resistant. PCR does the same thing in a different way, only faster and more definitively. When diagnosing a throat infection the non pathogenic bacteria the “immune system can defeat” are likely low in number and will not be detected in the early cycles like the organism causing the infection. PCR can and is used to amplify minute quantities (generally DNA oligos for cloning), but thats not usually how it’s used in infectious disease diagnostics.