Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Brooklyn Attitude

The assay eliminates the human response to whatever is present. The human response is either illness or health. Presence doesn’t mean ‘illness’ by any definition. This assay was to identify pathogens present in too few a number to be identified by other means.

The CDC had the PCR test, which was not based on the COvid virus, but on a ‘related corona virus’ run at 40 cycles until the ‘vaccine’ was released, and then it had the C19 PCR test run at 25 cycles for the unvaccinated only. The vaccinated continued to have their PCR’s run at 40 cycles (meaningless results).


24 posted on 03/28/2025 2:31:38 PM PDT by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: ransomnote

A Federal Judge just declared that the PCR tests are valid.


25 posted on 03/28/2025 2:32:42 PM PDT by Lazamataz (I'm so on fire that I feel the need to stop, drop, and roll!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote

“The assay eliminates the human response to whatever is present. The human response is either illness or health. Presence doesn’t mean ‘illness’ by any definition.”

That’s true, that’s why responsible physicians don’t order PCR tests for people who are not sick or showing symptoms typical of infection with a suspected pathogen. I’m not going to defend the use of PCR for the Covid scamdemic. The guidelines and cycle number the CDC recommended were ridiculous.


26 posted on 03/28/2025 2:49:52 PM PDT by Brooklyn Attitude (Trump may be one of our greatest Presidents, if they don't kill him first.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson