“PCR is not a diagnostic test, it is a DNA amplification PROCESS. Nothing more.”
Not true. PCR is used as a diagnostic tool because it can detect the presence of DNA specific to a pathogen, therefore if the DNA is present the pathogen (target DNA) is present. That is about as simple as I can explain it. You can also tell how much of the target DNA is present by how many copy cycles it takes to give a detectable signal. If it takes a large number of cycles there was very little of the pathogen. If it only takes a few there a lot of the infectious organism is present. Back when I started doing PCR it was easy to get false positive results, these days it is much easier because there are computer programs to help identify the right primers/temperatures/cycle times etc.
In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Labcorp has ramped up FAKE fraudulent Bird Flu tests in the U.S. | the PCR process is not a diagnostic test, but is used to create pandemics on demand. , Brooklyn Attitude wrote: “PCR is not a diagnostic test, it is a DNA amplification PROCESS. Nothing more.”
Not true. PCR is used as a diagnostic tool because it can detect the presence of DNA specific to a pathogen, therefore if the DNA is present the pathogen (target DNA) is present. That is about as simple as I can explain it. You can also tell how much of the target DNA is present by how many copy cycles it takes to give a detectable signal. If it takes a large number of cycles there was very little of the pathogen. If it only takes a few there a lot of the infectious organism is present. Back when I started doing PCR it was easy to get false positive results, these days it is much easier because there are computer programs to help identify the right primers/temperatures/cycle times etc.aaaaaaaaa
~~~~~
ransomnote: You can inhale pathogens in a car ride to the doctors office, where your throat is swabbed and the swab is tested for pathogens. The fact that there were pathogens on the swab doesn't mean you were actually sick.
Your immune system can fight off an illness without becoming ill - but the PCR would say you had pathogens so you're sick. You could have been exposed weeks ago and the pathogen is still in your body, or you were sick weeks ago and the pathogen is still in your body, giving you a false diagnosis of 'Covid' and all the baggage that comes with it.
The presence of the pathogen CAN mean illness or it can mean exposure of negligible amounts, recovery from illness weeks ago, substantial exposure your immune system defeats. The PCR is not appropriate for diagnostic purposes, according to inventor Kary Mullis.
The powers that be determind that if you had a positive covid 'test' then if you died for any reason in the next 60 days, it was 'Covid.'
We went through a fake pandemic with a fake test they used to control the narrative.
Fauci said anything more than 25 cycles meant only nucleotides were left in the sample. Until the 'vaccine' was released, the CDC was running PCR tests at 40 cycles (they knew it was too high). Then when the vax came out, PCR 'tests' were run at 25 cycles for unvaccinated, and 40 cycles for 'vaccinated'. Make that make sense.