Next question:
Why did that ‘staffer’ have a direct line to The Atlantic journalist?
This sounds more and more like a set-up and a planted scandal.
This staffer should be fired immediately and investigated by the FBI.......................
Agree with all that.
Waltz said on Ingraham that Goldberg's number was under someone else's name, and that person was who they thought they were including, but that person was NOT included. This seems very deliberate.
heads up for RB’s reply to V_TWIN’s post upthread:
xxxxxxxxxxxx
To: V_TWIN
Next question:
Why did that ‘staffer’ have a direct line to The Atlantic journalist?
This sounds more and more like a set-up and a planted scandal.
This staffer should be fired immediately and investigated by the FBI.......................
This sounds more and more like a set-up and a planted scandal.
Considering the actual content of the discussion, it sounds like they may have set a trap to expose the moles!
“...keep your enemies closer.”
“Why did that ‘staffer’ have a direct line to The Atlantic journalist?”
My thought also. Why would this guy’s number be even close to the White House? It’s like ‘accidently’ sending your ex-wife an invitation to your wedding.
+1
That should be question #1, right?
Should be the overall tone of the thread imho.
As I’ve stated all along, “smells.”
The lefties NEVER stop to consider anything (WAY beyond their intellect) and have jumped on this with both feet, but occasionally "leaks" of this nature are INTENTIONAL for one reason or another.
“This sounds more and more like a set-up and a planted scandal.”
How could it not be? Either a scapegoat (possibly guilty) staffer, or a tech hack.