On X I saw an interview with the medical doctor assigned to investigate the case. He stated vthat the child did not die ofthe measles bit died because she got a secondary infection causing pneumonia and was inadequately treated with correct antibiotics at the hospital.
I have never seen or heard of such a bald statement in a medical review. My guess is that she had a very bad physician treating her and the reviewer and the hospital are after the the treating physician’s license.
Interesting.
Inadequately treated with not the right kind of antibiotics which the reviewer emphasized was not normal standard practice. The reviewer referred to known standard practices that were not followed.
DIE? PERHAPS?