I don’t see in the aeticle if there’s a differentiation between smoking it or the edible version.
“I don’t see in the aeticle if there’s a differentiation between smoking it or the edible version.”
Which is how you know that the study had a predetermined outcome. It is not hard to guess that smoking dope is bad for you in many ways. It is also not hard to figure out that smoking it is going to have many different effects than eating it. The fact that the article does not state any difference between the two is proof that they had an agenda that was disconnected from finding the full truth. Therefore even though some of the premises may be true the study is not to be trusted scientifically.