To: cgbg
but where is the proof that the subordinate had been directed to sign in a specific instance.Proof would only be required if this matter were legally challenged. In such a case, the burden of proof would initially rest on the plaintiff to demonstrate that the autopen was used without proper authorization.
31 posted on
03/15/2025 4:37:22 AM PDT by
RoosterRedux
("There's nothing so inert as a closed mind" )
To: RoosterRedux
That is where the courts fail us.
The reason we may not have the evidence is that the criminals were not kind enough to keep it for us!
32 posted on
03/15/2025 4:39:01 AM PDT by
cgbg
(The Democrat Party is a criminal enterprise.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson