“directing a subordinate”
OK—but where is the proof that the subordinate had been directed to sign in a specific instance.
The details are critical here.
Proof would only be required if this matter were legally challenged. In such a case, the burden of proof would initially rest on the plaintiff to demonstrate that the autopen was used without proper authorization.
[”directing a subordinate”
OK—but where is the proof that the subordinate had been directed to sign in a specific instance.
The details are critical here.]
The case to be made is that Biden was incapable of directing his subordinates because of his profound dementia; therefore, his family members directed that they should be pardoned, along with others who could implicate them in the family graft scheme.