U.S. government / Elon Musk is investigating ActBlue

X ^ | March 8 | Elon Musk

[RandFan]

@elonmusk

An investigation has found 5 ActBlue-funded groups responsible for Tesla “protests”: Troublemakers, Disruption Project, Rise & Resist, Indivisible Project and Democratic Socialists of America.

ActBlue funders include George Soros, Reid Hoffman, Herbert Sandler, Patricia Bauman, and Leah Hunt-Hendrix.

ActBlue is currently under investigation for allowing foreign and illegal donations in criminal violation of campaign finance regulations. This week, 7 ActBlue senior officials resigned, including the associate general counsel.

If you know anything about this, please post in replies.

Thanks, Elon.

[Salman]

Terrorists. Should be treated as such.

[fuzzylogic]

Soros has been mixed up in enough racketeering and corruption that ANYTHING he’s involved with is justified to investigate.

[EQAndyBuzz]

“The sooner we can get him uninvolved in anything, the better.”

Arrest his son and his associates for financial manipulation and being an accomplice to domestic terrorism. Put them on the Do not fly list, take away their passports and imprison them for being flight risks. Does it warrant this? I don’t know, but if Letitia James and Alvin Bragg can invent crimes and get away with it, there is no reason why Trump’s DOJ cannot do the same thing.

Maybe file the complaint in Texas.

[Pete Dovgan]

What I think they will find:

My impression is that act blue (much like acorn) acted as a slush fund for the DNC and anti-US activities (yes I may have repeated myself). The game was laundering foreign money, and domestic money, through straw donors. Anyone who donated any money to a cause or the Democrats was put on a list. That list was used to re-donate illegal money into political causes of the aforementioned. They assigned millions of small donations to the list of individuals to prevent tracking. The persons were unaware of the donations themselves, only admitting to say a five dollar donation when 60k was donated by them. Many of these individuals will be found to be on government assistance programs, and their political donations will exceed their respective incomes. The actual money, and they call it ‘dark money’ was from three sources:
1. Cartels and the Chinese (so they could continue to kill, destroy, and bankrupt the United States) via mass murder and social programs for drug abuse and its public consequences. They needed the borders open to continue the drug and sex trade, the Democrats were happy to help.
2. Foreign hostile powered like China, Russia, Iran, Venezuela, as well as economic competition (like the Saudis funding the anti fracking campaigns) who had an interest in damaging US industry or its power.
3. The US taxpayer via ‘grants, government contractors, universities, USAID, social security fraud, contract fraud, State Department money laundering (Burisma) and the list goes on.

They declared war on the citizens of the United States. They funded a controllable demented puppet, and rigged an election, to continue the murder and treasury theft. These money and power were used to pay of reporters , and to buy off news agencies to prevent the ‘truth’ being given to the American people. This prevented ‘Democracy’, as the people believed that those who would stop these crimes were NAZI’s or Hitler.

That’s just my humble thoughts based upon limited research. Those associated with act blue are going to try to run off the sinking ship. Many will move ‘assets’ and flee jurisdiction. Act Blue was a funding front for criminal activities against the American people. It is just a small piece of the war. Perhaps, with time evidence of the contrary will be found, but don’t count on it.

[Jim Noble]

I’m pretty sure George Soros has passed the ball to whoever will be running his enterprise after he’s gone.

[Ann Archy]

Even the DEVIL doesn’t want him!!

[FrankRizzo890]

I believe EXACTLY the same thing.

[bitt]

ALSO

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/03/elon-musk-reveals-big-name-democratic-donors-funding/

Elon Musk Reveals The Big-Name Democratic Donors Funding Attacks on Tesla Stores

[Bob Ireland]

***An investigation has found 5 ActBlue-funded groups responsible for Tesla “protests”: Troublemakers, Disruption Project, Rise & Resist, Indivisible Project and Democratic Socialists of America.

ActBlue funders include George Soros, Reid Hoffman, Herbert Sandler, Patricia Bauman, and Leah Hunt-Hendrix ***

I posted to Elon Musk on X and Truth Social: prosecute; their wealth is NOT license! The Dems are beginning the same trip that they made in 1861 - firing on Fort Sumter 💥! They could not get their unconstitutional way then and they are failing now!

They turned to 'civil war' then, and they are increasingly calling for violence now. We must not let them repeat history. Calls for violence and insurrection MUST be prosecuted. Call for voters to vote a certain way is one thing... calls for violence, murder, rebellion is insurrection and must be prosecuted as such!

[rodguy911]

Great stuff got any links I love to go deep.

[rodguy911]

wow excellent stuff.

[rodguy911]

Very likely not the old man. no matter how many are taking his place but be sure the money is so big its not just one person.

[rodguy911]

I'm pretty sure James Okeefe outed act blue some time ago.

this piece from 2023 shows he was on to them and may have got some of the right people into the job of digging all the corruption that surrounds act blue.

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2023/03/29/james-okeefe-starts-looking-at-fraudulent-campaign-donations-fec-reported-donations-via-act-blue-appear-to-be-money-laundering/

James O’Keefe Starts Looking at Fraudulent Campaign Donations – FEC Reported Donations Via Act Blue Appear to be Money Laundering

March 29, 2023 | Sundance | 311 Comments

From the link:

“The O’Keefe Media Group broke its first story investigating what appears to be a national plot to utilize senior citizens matching a similar profile as vehicles to launder millions of dollars into political campaigns.” [link]

James O’Keefe uses publicly available FEC data to locate donors who are reported to have given thousands of donations to Act Blue. However, the people listed on the FEC reports have no idea why there is a massive difference between the number, frequency and scale of their contributions, compared to their actual donations. The differences are massive.

[Pete Dovgan]

You and me, we see!

[Pete Dovgan]

Look first at the texas https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/news/releases/investigation-actblue-attorney-general-ken-paxton-uncovers-large-number-suspicious-donations-made

Then go back an search Brietbarthttps://www.breitbart.com/politics/2024/09/21/democrat-donor-platform-actblue-faces-investigation-from-house-republicans-into-potential-fraud/

https://san.com/cc/republicans-expand-their-actblue-smurfing-investigation-to-19-states/

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/exclusive-data-shows-that-half-of-2019-donations-to-actblue-came-from-untraceable-unemployed-donors
https://capitalresearch.org/article/actblue-the-lefts-favorite-dark-money-machine/

https://capitalresearch.org/article/actblue-the-lefts-favorite-dark-money-machine/

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/sep/13/actblue-donations-half-unemployed-givers-analysis-/

Start there and just search related. I am certain there is a problem, at least that’s my opinion

[GOPJ]

ActBlue is currently under investigation for allowing foreign and illegal donations in criminal violation of campaign finance regulations. This week, 7 ActBlue senior officials resigned, including the associate general counsel.

ActBlue - Soros cash...

[Liz]

nypost.com

Edited Excerpt-—— Musk shared a report, which outlined concerns over ActBlue’s financial activities, including allegations that it was a money-laundering operation to funnel USAID money to the Democrats. The report also highlighted key questions: Why did ActBlue’s small-dollar donations dry up as soon as USAID funding was cut off? Why did the organisation’s top seven executives resign?

For years, the Democrats have maintained a significant fundraising advantage, with ActBlue playing a central role. The platform operates as a pseudo-payment processor, allowing Democratic donors to store their payment details and make political contributions with ease — claims that have been raised by Republican lawmakers and critics of the organisation. This system enables one-click or two-click donations, as well as recurring monthly contributions.

But serious concerns have been raised about the nature of donations flowing through ActBlue. Republican lawmakers, including Florida Senator Marco Rubio, have questioned how some individuals — particularly senior citizens — were listed as making thousands of contributions without their knowledge. These cases have fuelled suspicions of a possible “straw donor” scheme, where donations are attributed to unsuspecting individuals.

Attorneys general in Virginia, Missouri, Wyoming, and Texas have all launched investigations into reports showing a similar pattern: single donors contributing to Democratic campaigns at suspiciously high volumes and frequencies.

He further claimed that ActBlue is currently under investigation for accepting foreign and illegal donations in violation of campaign finance regulations. “This week, 7 ActBlue senior officials resigned, including the associate general counsel,” Musk wrote.

Musk’s allegations have been widely circulated by right-wing influencers. He reposted a tweet by blogger Mario Nawfal, who echoed Musk’s claims about ActBlue, Soros, and Hoffman. Nawfal’s post vaguely cited X, the New York Post, and conservative outlet BizPac Review as sources. But the BizPac Review article only referenced Musk’s claims, while reports from the New York Post about Tesla protests did not attribute them to ActBlue, Soros, or Hoffman.

Over the past two decades, ActBlue has facilitated more than $16 billion in donations. Musk had already signalled his scepticism about ActBlue, writing on X: “Something stinks about ActBlue.”

snip