Rick Zbur tried to defend himself after people were outraged by his proposal.
Republican California Assemblyman David Tangipa blasted Zbur’s insane proposed legislation.
People were outraged over this bill.
And, as someone said, "They never should have shut down the INSANE ASYLUMS and MENTAL WARDS"
I’m old enough to remember when a California assemblyWOMAN introduced a bill that would not allow off duty cops to pack heat while off duty.
And, as someone said, “They never should have shut down the INSANE ASYLUMS and MENTAL WARDS”
Your comment strikes me as doubly ironic-—
Both because the California House and Senate obviously qualify as Insane Asylums,
and because my Father (a Naval deck officer—albeit only for ‘Nam-—but Grandad was a lifer) has some (im)pertinent beliefs concerning Airdales.
Did he Fire his security first ?
Soon you will be required to house felons in your home.
All of us don’t have capacity to overestimate craziness of democrats, believe or not
More from the Democrat death cult
He is a well-known LGBT civil rights advocate and is active in the environmental movement. Zbur is also notable as the first openly gay non-incumbent U.S. congressional primary candidate to win an election.
Sounds like an open invitation for crooks.
Glad I don’t live in California.
I pray the BILL doesn’t pass.
How to say it kindly? This is one of the stupidest bills ever. Even by the Stete of Californication standards.
Makes pwrfect sense. Last fall, California voters overturned that stupid law that Kamala promoted that allowed a person to steal $1,000 without criminal prosecution.
So now the Dems are trying to open up new hunting grounds for the feral population to prey.
Can we defend ourselves using a pointed stick?
Trying to bring back the old Slave and Black Codes of “Duty to flee” rather than stand your ground. Now for everyone.
“They never should have shut down the INSANE ASYLUMS and MENTAL WARDS”
I’ve been saying this for years. When closed in the 1970s the mass murder rate took off like a rocket!
Hahaha. As if Sacramento cares what the people think.
What a great idea to reduce crime!
Brings the meaning pf the term ‘back tracking’ to mean retreat out the back door specific to commiefornians
It ought to go the opposite direction, where people are free to defend without prosecution.
Freepers,
Please read the proposed changes to Section 197 of the Penal Code:
Section 3:
(A) The person reasonably believed that they were in imminent
danger of death or great bodily injury, and had exhausted
every reasonable means to escape such danger other than the
use of force likely to cause death or great bodily injury.
(B) In good faith, the person withdrew from the encounter
with the other assailant or assailants and indicated clearly
to the other assailant or assailants that the person desired
to withdraw and terminated the use of any force, but the
other assailant or assailants continued or resumed the use of
force.
The whole thing is based upon the ability to retreat to complete safety. If you can’t, then you can use the force needed to protect yourself. It clarifies the over use and improper use and in a couple of ways protects the user by definition or better defines the current questionable use. If you run out of retreat, you can act. That will now be a given.
wy69
No matter what “laws” they pass, remember it is better to be judged by twelve than carried by six.