Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 03/01/2025 Vol.505, Q Day 2682

qalerts.app ^ | 03/01/2025 | FReeQs, FReepers, LurQers and Vanity

[sweetiepiezer]

LEFT: Joe Scarborough declares presidents like Joe Biden never screamed and yelled about ignoring judges.

RIGHT: Joe Biden screams and yells about ignoring the Supreme Court.

https://x.com/i/status/1902012257502114158

[foldspace]

what are the top 10 "New" items discovered by X users about the JFK Files released today and do they point to a main 'actor' in the assassination?

Top 10 "New" Items Discovered by X Users

CIA Payment to Anti-Castro Group Linked to Oswald
A declassified memo from August 1963 reportedly shows that George Joannides, a CIA covert operations officer, authorized payments to the Directorio Revolucionario Estudiantil (DRE), an anti-Castro group that had contact with Lee Harvey Oswald. X users suggest this strengthens the theory of CIA involvement or negligence.

Suppressed Grassy Knoll Witness Testimony
Documents allegedly include a previously suppressed statement from a Dallas bystander claiming a shot came from the grassy knoll, supporting the "second shooter" theory. X posts emphasize this as evidence contradicting the lone-gunman narrative.

Mafia-CIA Collaboration on Cuban Operations
Wiretap transcripts reveal discussions between mob bosses and CIA operatives about training Cuban exiles, hinting at a nexus of organized crime and intelligence interests. X users tie this to motives of revenge against Kennedy’s anti-mob policies.

Oswald’s Mexico City Surveillance Details
Newly unredacted CIA files detail extensive wiretapping of Oswald’s visits to the Soviet and Cuban embassies in Mexico City weeks before the assassination. X users speculate this shows the CIA knew more about Oswald’s movements than previously admitted.

JFK’s Distrust of CIA
A June 1961 memo from aide Arthur Schlesinger Jr. to Kennedy, now fully unredacted, highlights the president’s growing mistrust of the CIA post-Bay of Pigs. X posts suggest this could have motivated agency insiders to act against him.

Ballistic Evidence Anomalies
Ballistic reports in the files reportedly indicate inconsistencies with the Warren Commission’s three-shot timeline, fueling X discussions about a possible second shooter or altered evidence.

Mob Threats Against Kennedy
Transcripts of wiretaps capture mob figures discussing the need to “take care of Kennedy,” linking them to Cuban operatives and anti-Castro groups. X users point to this as evidence of mafia orchestration.

CIA Officer’s Alarm Over Oswald
A November 1963 memo from a CIA officer expresses concern over Oswald’s activities, suggesting internal awareness of a potential threat. X posts question why this wasn’t acted upon, hinting at negligence or complicity.

Acoustic Evidence Reaffirmed
The files reportedly include data supporting the 1979 House Select Committee on Assassinations’ finding of a “high probability” of a second shooter based on acoustic evidence. X users see this as validation of conspiracy theories.

Jack Ruby’s CIA Non-Connection Clarified
A 1964 CIA document states no evidence links Jack Ruby (Oswald’s killer) to Oswald or the agency, countering some conspiracy claims. X users debate whether this rules out Ruby as a key actor or reinforces a cover-up.

Do They Point to a Main "Actor" in the Assassination?
The discoveries highlighted by X users do not conclusively identify a single "main actor" responsible for Kennedy’s assassination. Instead, they suggest a complex web of potential players, with three primary entities emerging as focal points:

CIA: Items like the Joannides payment, Oswald surveillance, and JFK’s distrust point to possible CIA involvement, either through direct action, negligence, or failure to share intelligence. However, no definitive "smoking gun" ties the agency to orchestrating the hit.

Mafia: Mob threats and collaboration with anti-Castro groups suggest organized crime had motive (revenge for RFK’s crackdown) and means (connections to Cuban exiles). Yet, evidence remains circumstantial, lacking a clear directive to kill JFK.

Second Shooter/Unknown Actor: Grassy knoll testimony, ballistic anomalies, and acoustic evidence revive the idea of an unidentified second shooter, but no specific individual or group is named as the mastermind.

The official narrative—Lee Harvey Oswald as the lone gunman—remains challenged but not definitively overturned. X users lean toward a conspiracy involving the CIA and mafia, possibly with Cuban exile involvement, rather than a single "main actor." Historians cited in sources like Reuters and The New York Times caution that while these files fill in gaps, they’re unlikely to fundamentally rewrite the story without more concrete proof.

Caveats
These findings are based on early X posts (e.g., from users like @SoftwareBrian ) and initial media reports, not a comprehensive review of all 80,000 pages. The rapid pace of social media analysis means some claims may be exaggerated or misinterpreted. For a definitive answer, researchers will need weeks or months to sift through the documents, cross-referencing them with prior releases and existing evidence.

In summary, the "new" items fuel speculation about CIA, mafia, and second-shooter roles but don’t yet pinpoint a singular orchestrator of JFK’s assassination. The conversation on X reflects intrigue and skepticism, keeping the mystery alive as analysis continues.





*yawn* ([F])

"Reports that say that something hasn't happened are always interesting to me, because, as we know, there are known knowns; there are things we know that we know. There are known unknowns. That is to say, there are things that we now know we don't know. But there are also unknown unknowns. There are things we do not know we don't know."
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -D. Rumsfeld February 12, 2002 press conference

[sweetiepiezer]

Chucklehead Schumer mocks hard-working taxpayers who don’t want to pay for pronoun studies in Sri Lanka and kindergarten drag shows.

And the Democrats wonder why they are so loathed by Americans.

https://x.com/i/status/1902062865978421302

[linMcHlp]

“Top 10 “New” Items Discovered by X Users”

bttt

[sweetiepiezer]

A mother in Gaza saw distressing images of her son online and rushed to the hospital, fearing he was killed.

When she arrived, she discovered that the blood in the photos was fake—they were just staging a scene for propaganda. The deception is constant.

watch the “injured man” taking off his “wound” dressing https://x.com/i/status/1902046451552665971

[Bigg Red]

MarQ

[little jeremiah]

Very interesting, I did not know that.

[Sobieski at Kahlenberg Mtn.]

One People, One Responsibility: Erasing the Hamas Mask

https://amuseonx.substack.com/p/one-people-one-responsibility-erasing

Excerpt:

Labeling Gaza’s militant rulers as “Hamas” conveniently severs Palestinian identity from its political and moral consequences. This distinction grants innocence—or at least plausible deniability—to the broader population who once cast ballots for their governance, sustain them with moral or logistical support, and share a distinct national identity separate from other Arabs......the entire Palestinian populace in Gaza must be held to the standard that their representatives, or at the very least their cohabitants, have set.

Hamas did not descend upon Gaza as a foreign entity. They emerged from the local populace, earned electoral legitimacy in 2006, and have entrenched themselves through both political maneuvering and force. By continuing to call the perpetrators of violence “Hamas,” we shield the surrounding community from their share of responsibility. If Hamas is a U.S.- and EU-designated terrorist organization, how did these “outsiders” seize power unless the very people they govern had a hand in legitimizing or protecting them?

.....f the people are sovereign, they are responsible for what their government does—be it dispensing charity or launching rockets. The label “Hamas” is a rhetorical fig leaf, giving the impression that a violent faction is the only culprit while the wider population remains conveniently offstage. At worst, this fosters the notion of a morally neutral “bystander majority” that is neither morally nor politically accountable. But in a society where families often live mere blocks from rocket sites, where tunnels are dug under neighborhoods, and where widespread celebrations sometimes follow violent attacks, the lines blur. Those lines should be erased entirely.

.....When Israeli and American hostages were released over the past two months, jubilant crowds of Palestinians took to the streets, not in sorrow for the suffering endured by these captives, but in grotesque displays of mockery. These were not Hamas militants alone but ordinary Palestinian men, women, and children taunting and humiliating the hostages, an act not of coercion but of communal participation. There were massive parades, widespread cheers, and chants of defiance. The sheer scale of these celebrations leaves no room for the fiction that Hamas is an occupying force lording over an unwilling people. They are not its captives; they are its willing chorus.

Limiting our language to “Hamas” alone inadvertently excuses the rank-and-file population that voted for those leaders and, in many cases, still provides them cover.......

After all, every member of Hamas is, by definition, Palestinian. By insisting on naming the collective, we deny the rhetorical sleight of hand that permits a population to step aside and deny authorship of its leaders’ actions. If people are sovereign, then they bear sovereign responsibility, no matter what banner their militants fly.

Writers, journalists, and commentators must recognize this reality in their language. The inhabitants of Gaza are not hostages of Hamas—they are its lifeblood. The global conversation must reflect this truth. Referring to them simply as “Palestinians” rather than allowing the false partition of “Hamas” grants moral clarity. It is time to end the linguistic evasion that excuses collective accountability and instead call this conflict what it is: a war waged by a nation, not just a faction.
****************

The author is incorrect in that there is no nation called Palestine. The ‘nation’ waging this war is Arab and Islamic. So called Fakestinians are on Israeli territory and like DJT said they should be sent to Jordan, Egypt et al.

[Sobieski at Kahlenberg Mtn.]

Dragon Falls (Churun Meru), Venezuela

[Sobieski at Kahlenberg Mtn.]

[little jeremiah]

The sky event is yet to be determined. Maybe in hindsight? My current theory about sky event, and it is likely wrong.
Q team will be using the EAS to communicate with us. How will it be done? How about Starlink? No one can stop it, if it’s by some regular carrier they could block POTUS messages. Once at night hub and I saw a stream of bring lights high in the sky, realized it was Starlink satellites or whatever they are. Elon used it for Norther Carolina. So... I think the Sky Event may be when Elon uses Starlink to facilitate POTUS’ messages when “it” all happens. And I think it’s clear that Elon has been part of this plan from the beginning.

There are two drops using Emergency Alert System.This one has photo of a phone.
https://qalerts.app/?n=2099

I like this one, just copying part of it:

https://qalerts.app/?n=1328

Stay on point.
This is NOT about a single person.
This is NOT about fame, followers, or profiteering.
We, the PEOPLE.
We, the PEOPLE.
We, the PEOPLE.
THERE WILL COME A TIME THEY WILL NOT BE SAFE WALKING DOWN THE STREET.
We will not be held hostage.
SKY EVENT.
WWG

[little jeremiah]

Good night FRens, FReeQs, FReepers, Truth Diggers, LurQers, Digital Soldiers, anons, and everyone on the right side in this war against evil; wishing you peaceful dreams and a happy morning. May God bless each of us with what we need the most, and protect us from hidden dangers or temptations.

Indeed the safest road to Hell is the gradual one--
the gentle slope, soft underfoot,
without sudden turnings, without milestones,
without signposts...
Your affectionate uncle,
Screwtape.

[Gasshog]

4153

[stylin19a]

I wasn’t being quite fair...President Trump didn’t get tried until February 9, 2021... after he left office.
Roberts felt he was no longer bound by the constitution.
Which always made me wonder by the impeachment wasn’t rescinded.

https://www.cnn.com/2021/01/25/politics/john-roberts-trump-impeachment/index.html

[LonePalm]

Well, well, they are even simulating PRIFLY these days.

SpyNavy

Garde la Foi, mes amis! Nous nous sommes les sauveurs de la République! Maintenant et Toujours!
(Keep the Faith, my friends! We are the saviors of the Republic! Now and Forever!)
LonePalm, le Républicain du verre cassé (The Broken Glass Republican)

[stars & stripes forever]

I thought JFK Jr. was going to get chemtrails banned.

They are a major factor in this abnormal weather.

[stars & stripes forever]

IMO, the JFK Files are the new OJ Simpson trial. The media will focus all summer on a subject that will never have a conclusion for the express purpose of not reporting the corruption that is being exposed via DOGE.

[ponygirl]

.

[Farcesensitive]

https://twitter.com/BGatesIsaPyscho/status/1902235846801015053

So what do the JFK Files tell us so far?

- JFK called Joe Biden a Traitor
- CIA orchestrated the entire assassination
- Links to Mossad & Israel
- Ties to the Khazarian Mafia?
- Gary Underhill was murdered after revealing it was a CIA operation

[HoneysuckleTN]

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/114187128423651010