Posted on 02/27/2025 8:52:11 AM PST by Red Badger
If you’re gonna have ‘OT’ at all, then why not go the full 15 minutes, regardless of who scores what or when.
I never liked the Sudden Death OT rules..................
Optimal? Maybe they mean optical.
Or you just do what they do in soccer. You play the full 15 minutes, and if’s still tied you go to a “Kick Off”. You have each kicker kick from 50-yards until one makes a kick and the other misses, and repeat until there’s a winner.
I think you are correct................
Two hr nap time to help older viewers?
The best alternative to overtime is “criteria”.
The game is never tied. The team with criteria is always winning.
Criteria:
Highest score - If you have the highest score, you are winning
Most TDs - If it is tied 17-17 but one team has 2 TDs, 2 XPs and a FG and the other has 1 TD, 1- 2PConv, 3 FGs, the one with 2 TDs is winning
Last to score - If it is 17-17, the last one to score is winning.
Before you knock it....You should watch a competition that uses it. International wrestling uses it. It creates a constant sense of urgency. One team (or wrestler) is always doing everything they can to get the criteria. You never see wrestlers waiting out the clock so that they can get to OT.
It’s a way better system.
Too complicated for football players..................
In Texas High School Football they used Penetrations - the number of times a team drove within the 20 yard line. If that was tied, they would then use first downs.
I think the opening kickoff and the third quarter kickoff should be a RUBGY SCRUM with the five offensive lineman.
Same for overtime, the ref just rolls the ball in there. Would make for a really exciting play, especially in a close or overtime game.
That works too, but as it is, if a team scores a TD on their first possession, game over. That ain’t fair IMO..
Free throws. Maybe penalty shots.
Up to the defense to stop them. If they get a 3-and-out, most likely that’s the ball game right there.
How about this:
Line up the way they do now, but no downfield receiver. Ball must land inbounds, not end zone. Both teams start running when the ball hits the ground, then they run after the ball free-for-all. If it bounces out of bounds or into the end zone then the receiving team gets the ball on the 20 yard line..............
I don’t know if you have ever seen it used but it’s really not that complicated.
Most of the time it comes down to....who scored last? If a wrestler has a big throw or if there are multiple big throws in a match then it gets a little complicated.
As long as there aren’t a bunch of missed XPs and safeties in a game, football would be about the same.
Wrestling is a much faster pace with less time to think about it. Football is so slow paced, it would be very easy to know who has criteria. However, it would make in-game decisions a little bit trickier. It would likely cause ALOT more 2 point conversions if the coach knew that the other team tying it up 7-7 on the next drive would put them in the lead.
Gotta love ole George!
This is my favorite George rule:
“Here’s another suggestion for basketball, I would allow twenty-five points for any ball that goes in the basket off another guy’s head. You’d see some good fights during those close games, I’ll tell you.”
Quit screwing around with what used to be an exciting game
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.