Never said you did. But wouldn't have had a problem with your labelling some men as such.
Yet, you made no mention of the virtuous women in your reply. Why not?
Because the behavior of NON-virtuous and delusional women and the resultant skewing of the dating market (all ultimately due to the unprecedented unleashing of female sexuality caused by the "Pill," modern conveniences, Industrialization and the declining need for "muscle" at the workplace, online dating, etc.) gives rise to much more-conspicuous societal ills that can be more-easily recognized and subjected to debate.
It's EASY to discuss why the "Titanic" sank; it is much more difficult (and less interesting) to explain why countless other oceanliners DIDN'T sink.
NON-virtuous women are the ones who currently control the dating market; they are the ones who "set the rules." THEY are the ones dominating the market and contributing to societal collapse.
The phenomenon of VIRTUOUS women does not lend itself so well to discussion in a forum of this nature.
I do not deny that they exist - I'm married to one, and she is staunchly conservative, yet even she is prone to "female thinking," and thus has difficulty sometimes separating rational thought directed at achieving concrete, measurable results on one hand from the desire to achieve consensus and "feel-good" comity on the other, even at the expense of truth.
Regards,
Men seem to believe they are more rational than women, but men overreact emotionally, too.
This thread is an example - nearly 300 comments, just because a single mom dared to say she wants to marry and have more children.
There are many factors at play in the current dating market. Too many men are non-virtuous, too, but nothing is ever their fault, is it?