How about trying to actually respond to her actual post rather than picking out one paragraph out of the rest to avoid addressing she actually pointed out?
You constantly post verifiably false information. And you just expect everyone to go along with it without responding? Not going to happen.
Sod Off, sockpuppet troll.
In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Mega thread of evidence showing covid “vaccines” cause turbo cancers, Republican Wildcat wrote: How about trying to actually respond to her actual post rather than picking out one paragraph out of the rest to avoid addressing she actually pointed out?
You constantly post verifiably false information. And you just expect everyone to go along with it without responding? Not going to happen.
Not going to happen? On your watch? You're going to force me to post my medical rebutals from qualified physicians and researchers who put their name and reputation out there for all to see when exDemMom hides behind a pseudonym and claims to have expertise she doesn't actually have?
I've spent the time to respond to her in detail; she doesn't admit when she's wrong and just pompously parrots whatever she's supposed to say to defend the vax and vax purveyors.
Here's an example of me wasting my time responding to exDemMom in detail. She is just not going to admit that she's a pompous shill, but you plan to force me to post to her? How will you do that?
https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4288482/posts?page=33#33
Oh and this is a good example of her shilling for the CDC re bird flu. I can't say she ever came forward with a response to my post worth my time, or worth the time of those reading along.
https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4250045/posts?page=13#13
There are many to choose from. This one contained shameful levels of CDC apologetics and pomposity. Enjoy!
https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4243048/posts?page=70#70
Let's end with the excerpt below from this link. After you read it, get busy telling forcing me to waste time posting to a shill. I decide when my posting to her may be useful to others - exDemMom and people like you don't make that decision for me.
https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4266287/posts?page=23#23
"exDemMom: Plus, I notice that this is posted by ransomnote, who has been diligently posting antivax propaganda for several years now. He (?) is not a credible scientific source.
ransomnote:I don't see anyone lining up to take instruction from you as to what is, and is not, valid information. You're just as anonymous as I am, and while your responses are notably pompous and verbose, they ultimately rely on portraying everyone else as less intelligent then you are.
I've been posting about the Covid 'vaccines' (gene therapy) for a few years now and my assertions and posts have turned out to be far more accurate, sadly, than those by people who label me 'anti vax'.
I am qualified to post the results of researchers, physicians, or in this case, FOIA documents and CDC data. As an anonymous poster yourself, your objections to my supposed lack of qualifications are meaningless. I've spent the last few years proving pharma shills wrong. Most of the pharma shills fled; a few, like you, remain to name call, bite at heels and deny the truth as it is exposed."