Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/14/2025 6:09:55 AM PST by Rev M. Bresciani
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Rev M. Bresciani

Most people realize that but breaking precedents is always a can of worms.


2 posted on 02/14/2025 6:16:56 AM PST by ImJustAnotherOkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rev M. Bresciani

Adults in the room telling whiners no=๐Ÿ˜ญ๐Ÿ˜ต


5 posted on 02/14/2025 6:20:29 AM PST by rktman (Destroy America from within ? Check! WTH? Enlisted USN 1967 to end up with this๐Ÿ’ฉ? ๐Ÿšซ๐Ÿ’‰! ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‘!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rev M. Bresciani
Good article and on target.

This current "Trump appointee" who has extended the US Aid workers termination date justifies his actions that the overseas US Aid workers need transition time and it puts them in danger. Huh? That's your judicial job? Give me a break!
7 posted on 02/14/2025 6:22:40 AM PST by RushingWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rev M. Bresciani

Ignoring judicial decisions has consequences such as contempt of court. If a judge decides to fine the president for not implementing the judge’s wishes, things get messy as the U.S. Marshals Service is an executive branch agency which enforces court orders. The sitting president might order the the marshals ignore the court’s order, but what happens when he leaves office? Ultimately, Congress has a role to play in limiting the jurisdiction of the federal courts to interfere in the executive branch decisions. That doesn’t happen because Congress likes the ability to join with the courts to check the executive branch. When the public is sufficiently outraged, Congress will vote to limit judicial oversight of the executive branch.


10 posted on 02/14/2025 6:24:53 AM PST by Dr. Franklin ("A republic, if you can keep it." )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rev M. Bresciani

“The Founders of this Great nation set it up like a three legged stool...no one leg has more power than the other two lest the stool falls over” L.Star. of course they didn’t anticipate just how soon the stool would become ubiquitous in each leg. “what we term “The swamp” is more like a construction site outhouse that hasn’t been serviced in decades” L.Star


11 posted on 02/14/2025 6:26:35 AM PST by Qwapisking ("The left will rue the day they cheated Trump out of the 2020 election forever" L.Star )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rev M. Bresciani

I do believe in the three co-equal branches of government.

But that doesn’t mean that every congressional aid is = to the president or that every circuit judge is equal to the president.

It means that the SC is equal to the congress as a whole and to the president.


13 posted on 02/14/2025 6:33:26 AM PST by TexasFreeper2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rev M. Bresciani

but Trump can investigate these same judges ,LOL


16 posted on 02/14/2025 6:42:12 AM PST by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rev M. Bresciani

you can expect the district whores to give the left what they want

of course the left has their favorite whores and seek them out whenever they are losing and need to stop their political opponents

regardless of the US Constitution

you just have to appeal until you find a judge that has read the document


18 posted on 02/14/2025 6:45:26 AM PST by joshua c
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rev M. Bresciani

PDJT should have a team of judges to consult with, if an injunction is clearly ‘null and void’ because it laughably flies in the face of ‘separation of powers’ as outlined in the Constitution, it should be ignored.

It is OK to ignore unlawful orders.


21 posted on 02/14/2025 6:51:13 AM PST by fuzzylogic (welfare state = sharing of poor moral choices among everybody)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rev M. Bresciani

In the 1867 Supreme Court case Mississippi v. Johnson, the State of Mississippi sought to prevent President Andrew Johnson from enforcing the Reconstruction Acts, arguing that these laws were unconstitutional. The Supreme Court unanimously held that it lacked the jurisdiction to issue an injunction against the President for performing his official duties, emphasizing the separation of powers and the discretionary nature of presidential responsibilities. This decision established that the judiciary cannot restrain the executive branch from executing laws passed by Congress, thereby maintaining the balance among the branches of government.


24 posted on 02/14/2025 6:58:57 AM PST by dware (Americans prefer peaceful slavery over dangerous freedom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rev M. Bresciani

Judicial power is paper power.

The lawfare against Trump proved that.

The lawfare would have gotten nowhere if not for Biden’s DOJ and the FBI which operates at the direction of the DOJ.

In Trump’s first term he was BLINDSIDED and STABBED in the back by Deep State moles in his OWN DOJ like Little Beauregard Sessions and Bill Barr.

I put a lot of blame on the coup with the fifty spies who lied, but that could have been negated by Billy Barr who put the laptop in limbo by offering no evidence to its authenticity which allowed Elite Stream Media to pimp the lie without any “official” denial of the lie.

This time around we trust he has a better team in Patel/Bondi.

And today is the day the rubber meets the road.

I will be greatly disappointed if Kash Patel is not the pit bull that he has made himself out to be.


26 posted on 02/14/2025 7:07:03 AM PST by Biblebelter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rev M. Bresciani

Screw the black-robed stooge supremacists! They’re just a bunch of America-hating RAT turd rollers.


29 posted on 02/14/2025 7:28:25 AM PST by FlingWingFlyer (The trouble with illegal aliens is that their own crappy countries don't even want them there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rev M. Bresciani

Here is the problem. The judicial branch no longer just enforces written law like they should. They now make up their own personal laws beyond what is codified by the legislative branch. This has made them an unconstitutional defacto branch making new or rewriting legislation with their personal opinionated rulings.

They have no legal right to make or rewrite legislation. This usurping of powers needs to be addressed.


31 posted on 02/14/2025 8:41:44 AM PST by Openurmind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rev M. Bresciani

Bookmark


33 posted on 02/14/2025 8:58:49 AM PST by gitmo (If your theology doesnโ€™t become your biography, what good is it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rev M. Bresciani

What an outstanding article! Summarizes exactly what’s going on. Black robed tyrants thinking they can make laws, scumbag politicians who are good with it when the right judge rules the “right” way, and the weak and feckless congress-critters refusal to do their job and jumping on the chance to place blame.
Outstanding!


35 posted on 02/14/2025 11:40:47 AM PST by vpintheak (Screw the ChiComms! America first!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson