The rest of the twtt/x post:
“...threshold that has never been adjusted for inflation. This data-sharing framework, originally intended to track illicit financial activity, also allows financial institutions to share transaction insights with each other under absolute legal immunity.
In practice, this means that major financial institutions effectively operate their own version of FinCEN internally, gaining a comprehensive, real-time view of global money movements. While regulatory safeguards exist to ensure this data is used strictly for financial crime enforcement, it’s highly likely that the Treasury’s vast database holds key records on NGO funding flows.
Yet, there’s a growing concern that Treasury itself isn’t actively monitoring this data—outsourcing the heavy lifting to financial institutions instead. Whether due to oversight or intent, this leaves critical financial crime data untouched at the federal level.
Could this be why some are so resistant to
@DOGE
‘s involvement in Treasury systems? It’s less about routine transactions and more about preventing independent analysis of a financial intelligence goldmine.
“
THe look on this guy’s face in the article, makes me think “bribery.” THe DOJ destroyed the file on the guy too.