Replies

Of course I do.

You seem to misunderstand my point. My point is that Fauci’s intents are irrelevant because, even if the intent came from Heaven itself, he is still a criminal.

Fauci can say whatever he wants and it doesn’t matter. That’s why any argument he makes has been disarmed.

I’m disarming the arguement so it can’t be used as an excuse to avoid punishment.

You don’t disagree with me, but you disagree with what you are thinking I am saying. You think that I’ve said that it is somehow less bad because Fauci had good reasons. I never said that. I said, even if he had the most pure reasons for what he did, it doesn’t matter.

Yes, I was not understanding what argument you were trying to disarm, which is exactly why I was trying to get you to be more specific as to what you meant when you said you wanted to disarm the argument. If I wasn't sure what your statement meant, perhaps others also were not clear what you meant to convey either.

Now I agree with you, he still needs to be held accountable, and others also need to be held accountable for their crimes against humanity, worldwide. Perhaps other nations will hold the people accountable for their actions against their citizens as well.

Because to do nothing will just encourage more of this criminal behavior to keep reoccurring.