Skip to comments.
PDJT conviction on Friday
me ^
| 1/8/25
| me
Posted on 01/08/2025 3:53:33 PM PST by eastforker
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 next last
To: eastforker
21
posted on
01/08/2025 4:15:52 PM PST
by
TexasGator
(1/|1211i.11'1/'1/11111)
To: eastforker
SCOTUS has ruled that POTUS has immunity for official duties. He is not obligated to follow the law regarding petty issues.
22
posted on
01/08/2025 4:17:45 PM PST
by
granite
("It's a Barnum and Bailey World, Just as Phony as it can be.")
To: ChuckHam
Hey, I was asking what would happen if the left threw out this scenario as an excuse to declare the president ineligible to have access to the nuclear football since he would be a convicted felon and what would be a remedy for it. You think they will not be grasping at straws to do whatever they can to sideline Trump?
23
posted on
01/08/2025 4:20:47 PM PST
by
eastforker
(All in, I'm all Trump,what you got!)
To: eastforker
All this drama over legally writing checks. Ridiculous.
24
posted on
01/08/2025 4:21:23 PM PST
by
fwdude
(Why is there a "far/radical right," but damned if they'll admit that there is a far/radical left?)
To: fwdude
Oh I agree but we are dealing with the left and they will try anything.
25
posted on
01/08/2025 4:22:57 PM PST
by
eastforker
(All in, I'm all Trump,what you got!)
To: eastforker
The Supreme Court has jurisdiction over this. The State of New York has convicted Trump of violating Federal election laws.
26
posted on
01/08/2025 4:23:14 PM PST
by
webheart
(S)
To: Lazamataz
Applauding! Best post today.
27
posted on
01/08/2025 4:23:17 PM PST
by
mairdie
To: eastforker
It doesn’t matter is my point. Who cares what those clowns think? They are making crap up and making those week-kneed spaz out. They can’t sideline Trump.
28
posted on
01/08/2025 4:24:34 PM PST
by
ChuckHam
To: ChuckHam
They would have sidelined him except he had the resources to fight back.
29
posted on
01/08/2025 4:25:47 PM PST
by
eastforker
(All in, I'm all Trump,what you got!)
To: eastforker
He could pardon himself 😂😂😂😂
30
posted on
01/08/2025 4:27:26 PM PST
by
Lockbox
(politicians, they all seemed like game show host to me.... Sting)
To: eastforker
“What does any of that have to do with what I posted.”
Do your homework.
31
posted on
01/08/2025 4:28:15 PM PST
by
TexasGator
(1/|1211i.11'1/'1/11111)
To: TexasGator; CivilWarBrewing
are you now answering for other FReepers who ask me a question?
32
posted on
01/08/2025 4:30:05 PM PST
by
eastforker
(All in, I'm all Trump,what you got!)
To: eastforker
“are you now answering for other FReepers who ask me a question?”
You ducked my question.
33
posted on
01/08/2025 4:31:43 PM PST
by
TexasGator
(1/|1211i.11'1/'1/11111)
To: Lazamataz; eastforker
The President does not have possession of the bomb, nor does he have possession of the nuclear football.
All he has is an authorization code.
34
posted on
01/08/2025 4:40:08 PM PST
by
UCANSEE2
(Dang it. Lost my tagline again. Stupid fingers. Stupid Keyboard. It wasn't MY fault.)
To: rfp1234
At worst, he wouldn’t be allowed to carry the football in NYS.The President never carries the nuclear football.
His job is not to be the quarterback, it's to be the coach calling the plays. He never even touches the Nuclear football.
35
posted on
01/08/2025 4:42:51 PM PST
by
UCANSEE2
(Dang it. Lost my tagline again. Stupid fingers. Stupid Keyboard. It wasn't MY fault.)
To: UCANSEE2; eastforker
The President does not have possession of the bomb, nor does he have possession of the nuclear football. All he has is an authorization code.Another good point.
Further, if he was considered to be in possession of every single conventional artillery shell, every single grenade, every single Claymore mine.... and standard BATFE laws applied... wouldn't he need to pay a 200$ tax for each Destructive Device and wait for the BATFE to clear him?
eastforker is right to imagine any bizarre scenario the left would try, but this particular one has no legs.
36
posted on
01/08/2025 4:43:03 PM PST
by
Lazamataz
(The BEST birthday present I ever got WAS DONALD TRUMP WINNING IN 2024!!!)
To: Lazamataz
You do know that the law also says a prohibited person may not have access also. It has been litigated that a married couple, one a felon the other not, the one who is not can not have a weapon in the household if the prohibited one has access to the weapon.
37
posted on
01/08/2025 4:46:52 PM PST
by
eastforker
(All in, I'm all Trump,what you got!)
To: eastforker
You do know that the law also says a prohibited person may not have access also. I'm tempted to go down this path with you to demonstrate its absurdity, but I'll refrain, and just note that this is completely absurd... for the reasons I have already detailed.
38
posted on
01/08/2025 4:49:59 PM PST
by
Lazamataz
(The BEST birthday present I ever got WAS DONALD TRUMP WINNING IN 2024!!!)
To: eastforker
I’ve always had my doubts about the “nuclear football”. Are we really supposed to believe that we telegraph to our enemies where the keys to our nukes are?
39
posted on
01/08/2025 4:52:12 PM PST
by
Tell It Right
(1 Thessalonians 5:21 -- Put everything to the test, hold fast to that which is true.)
To: eastforker
That is probably their plan.
40
posted on
01/08/2025 4:54:36 PM PST
by
for-q-clinton
(Cancel Culture IS fascism...Let's start calling it that!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson