This thread was not about Scott Adams until you just now bring him up. Your earlier comments were directed at posters, such a myself.
Scott Adams cited a poll.
By telephone and online, the group surveyed a thousand American adults, with this question: “Do you agree or disagree with this statement, ‘It’s OK to be white’?”
The report found that 72% of the respondents agreed, including 53% who are Black. Some 26% of Black respondents disagreed, and 21% said they are “not sure.” The poll also found that 79% of all the respondents agreed with the statement “Black people can be racist too.”
How is citing the results of a poll divisive?
How is my post divisive? And why should I give a crap what you think about it anyway, you profiler? I am not squelching my free speech because you have concerns about the ‘effect of internet posts’.
The only plausible motive for Scott Adams making that comment was that he was hoping to continue the divide between blacks and whites.
The race card has been the most powerful weapon against America used by our enemies since the day of Lincoln.
Our enemies have been terrified of the Black Lives Maga movement, so they hire Adams and fools on the internet to sow discord, a tactic of war used throughout history. Seeing it is true pattern recognition.