The issue I have with Salla's work is that it is speculative and unsupported by a convincing argument—though that doesn't necessarily mean it's untrue. That said, if Salla has knowledge of gravitic propulsion and is still alive to discuss it openly, it raises the question of why even a small aspect of this 'technology' hasn't visibly influenced today's military advancements.
Salla’s witnesses give general descriptions of what is happening—kinda like if you fly on a plane that does not mean you know how the engine works but you know what you are seeing when you look out the window.
I do not believe or disbelieve his stuff—I just pay attention to it, file it away for later—and then try to evaluate it when I get additional data from other sources.
There is no “soft landing” for disclosure—I think the .gov figured that much out in the 1940s.
You are either in—or you are out.
Grusch in particular has really messed up the coverup.