Salla’s witnesses give general descriptions of what is happening—kinda like if you fly on a plane that does not mean you know how the engine works but you know what you are seeing when you look out the window.
I do not believe or disbelieve his stuff—I just pay attention to it, file it away for later—and then try to evaluate it when I get additional data from other sources.
There is no “soft landing” for disclosure—I think the .gov figured that much out in the 1940s.
You are either in—or you are out.
Grusch in particular has really messed up the coverup.
I started excluding Salla a long time ago. I might have been wrong, but one has to draw the line somewhere.
As you know (as a financial professional), I am a skeptic until I can establish confidence in something. When it comes to this subject, the so-called truth is a moving target.
As an aside, I spent many years doing due diligence on companies and projects. I developed good antennae.
I don't invest (money or faith) until I can get comfortable...and I am very careful.
Agreed. Grusch has been well vetted and shown himself to be a solid whistleblower.
On another issue, I have develop a keen sense of who to listen to and who to discard.
You are in the elite group of those I listen to.
I still make mistakes, but I am always improving.;-)