Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Elsie

Forgot this to go with above:

Mark 2:22: “And no one puts new wine into old wineskins; or else the new wine bursts the wineskins, the wine is spilled, and the wineskins are ruined. But new wine must be put into new wineskins” (NKJV). Obviously the new wine would be the fresh unfermented kind.


146 posted on 01/05/2025 6:08:13 AM PST by vespa300
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies ]


To: vespa300; Elsie

Obviously the new wine would be the fresh unfermented kind.
.....

Acts 2
12Astounded and perplexed, they asked one another, “What does this mean?” 13But others mocked them and said, “They are drunk on new wine!

It sounds like new wine can actually be the fermented kind in the scriptures too, vespa..

They actually thought the Holy spirit work was like watching drunks!

Quite a remarkable event that old wineskins got that new wine of the Holy Spirit and they looked like a bunch of drunks to those in the same old wineskins without the new wine.

Glorified bodies,new wine skins, look like the best way to handle the new wine,instead of these old wine skins we’ve been born with..

That grape looks more and more like the fruit of the tree in the Garden of Eden..

Wonder how it transformed into an apple in the first place..


149 posted on 01/05/2025 8:42:53 AM PST by delchiante
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies ]

To: vespa300
Obviously the new wine would be the fresh unfermented kind

That is true, and, as it ferments it STRETCHES the newskins.


155 posted on 01/05/2025 10:53:39 AM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson