Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: numberonepal
Savage


1,883 posted on 01/09/2025 7:16:14 PM PST by numberonepal (WWG1WGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1880 | View Replies ]


To: All

1,884 posted on 01/09/2025 7:18:28 PM PST by Melian (✳✴️ Reminder: Memes are made to make you think or laugh. Verify for yourself before reposting. ✳️✴️)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1883 | View Replies ]

To: Snowybear; WildHighlander57; smileyface; numberonepal; bitt; Bob Ireland; Bigg Red; ...

Noah’s Nightly Newsletter – 1/9/25
https://truthlion.com/noahs-nightly-newsletter-1-9-25/

* Trump and Obama Cozy, Laughing and Chatting It Up At President Carter’s Funeral
* THE JOY IS GONE: Visible Hatred Displayed Between Biden/Harris Camps At Jimmy Carter Funeral
* Melania’s Shirt Collar Is Catching a Lot of Attention
* Here’s Why Michelle Obama Did Not Attend Jimmy Carter’s Funeral
* FAKE NEWS: Top ABC News Host EXPOSED On Live TV
* Trump’s “Manhattan Project” to create investing frenzy?
* John Fetterman Backs President Trump On Greenland Purchase
* BOMBSHELL: President Trump could reset the price of Gold to $40,000 overnight, Here’s How!
* JUST IN: President Trump Promises To Give Full Declass On The Drones On January 21st
* DEW Attack Caught On Camera In Los Angeles?
* THEY KNEW? Insurance Companies Canceled Hundreds of Policies Just Months Before Deadly Fires Wiped Out Everything
* BREAKING: Supreme Court Rules Against President Trump, Amy Coney Barrett Sides With Liberal Judges
* Lip Reader Reveals What President Trump Said To Obama At Jimmy Carter’s Funeral


1,886 posted on 01/09/2025 7:22:40 PM PST by stars & stripes forever (Blessed is the national whose GOD is the LORD. Psalm 33:12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1883 | View Replies ]

To: All

What the SCOTUS Actually Ruled (from a Pede)

Disclaimer: Not an attorney

IMHO From what I can gather, SCOTUS simply ruled there was no need for intervention at this time and the normal course of appeals is adequate for DJT to follow.

They were not ruling on an appeal of the verdict in the case but whether the sentencing should be delayed.

They based the conclusion of not needing to get involved at this point on the fact that Merchan has indicated that he is going to sentence to unconditional discharge and the burden on the President-Elect is minor, given that allowance of a virtual appearance.

Had there been any requirement for appearance in person, or possibility of any detainment, SCOTUS would have had to intervene.

This ruling in no way affects DJT’s appeal of the case. That appeal will move forward and most experts expect the verdict to be reversed.


1,888 posted on 01/09/2025 7:26:12 PM PST by numberonepal (WWG1WGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1883 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson