To: simpson96
“Selzer’s polling ‘miss’ was not an astonishing coincidence — it was intentional,” the suit states. “As President Trump observed: ‘She knew exactly what she was doing.'” I believe this 100%, but I also believe it will be hard to prove unless there's possibly real polling data that no real poster would conclude that Trump would be trounced.
17 posted on
12/21/2024 7:09:44 AM PST by
libertylover
(Our biggest problem, by far, is that almost all of big media is AGENDA-DRIVEN, not-truth driven.)
To: libertylover
Discovery may show emails between the pollster and some DC Democrat types giving instructions....
Let us see who was invited to the Partee....before we declare everyone innocent.
23 posted on
12/21/2024 7:19:38 AM PST by
cgbg
(It is time to pull the Deep State out of the mass media--like ticks from a dog.)
To: libertylover
Easy to prove. Pritzger leaked it prior to the poll coming out. How did he know beforehand?
32 posted on
12/21/2024 7:58:44 AM PST by
EQAndyBuzz
(Drill Baby Drill!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson