Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dismantling the Bill of Rights Is No Solution
American Thinker ^ | 19 Dec, 2024 | J.B. Shurk

Posted on 12/19/2024 3:53:52 AM PST by MtnClimber

Even if it ‘saves one life,’ we shouldn’t chuck the Second Amendment, just because some leftist politicians insist.

After the recent school shooting in Madison, Wisconsin, the usual suspects immediately called for more “gun control.” Joe Biden’s White House released a statement demanding these additional infringements upon Americans’ Second Amendment rights: “Universal background checks. A national red flag law. A ban on assault weapons and high-capacity magazines.” (The president conveniently ignored reports that the teenaged attacker used a 9mm pistol.) Democrat Congressman Mark Pocan insists that gun manufacturers be held responsible for the school shooter’s violence. Disgraced former FBI deputy director Andrew McCabe (who was rewarded for leaking classified information and lying to federal agents) wants “legislation that changes the context of gun ownership” in the United States and new requirements that “eliminate the ability” of Americans “to purchase guns without a background check.”

So the departing president wants executive authority to determine which Americans enjoy Second Amendment protections. The congressman from Wisconsin wants to hold manufacturers criminally and civilly liable for the misdeeds of others. And the former acting director of the FBI wants to fundamentally transform the “context of gun ownership.” What part of “shall not be infringed” do they not understand?

If we were still a country that took loyalty oaths seriously, it would be worth noting that all three of these men raised their hands and solemnly swore to protect and defend the Bill of Rights. As retired FBI supervisory special agent Arthur P. Meister once wrote, “all public office oaths require true faith and allegiance to principles of lawful authority derived from the Constitution.” An official’s “deference” to the Bill of Rights “must trump all other promises and commitments” precisely because “the public elects, empowers, and allows a select few to govern many.”

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Society
KEYWORDS: banglist; leftism

1 posted on 12/19/2024 3:53:52 AM PST by MtnClimber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber
If we were still a country that took loyalty oaths seriously, it would be worth noting that all three of these men raised their hands and solemnly swore to protect and defend the Bill of Rights.

But they are leftists and therefore are more loyal to the "father of lies".

2 posted on 12/19/2024 3:55:27 AM PST by MtnClimber (For photos of scenery, wildlife and climbing, click on my screen name for my FR home page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

“Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.”
- Benjamin Franklin


3 posted on 12/19/2024 4:03:19 AM PST by Leaning Right (It’s morning in America. Again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

http://www.assaultweaponwatch.com/


4 posted on 12/19/2024 4:08:54 AM PST by The Spirit Of Allegiance (Public Employees: Honor Your Oaths! Defend the Constitution from Enemies--Foreign and Domestic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leaning Right

“IF you think that government is overbearing now just until you are completely disarmed” L.Star


5 posted on 12/19/2024 4:14:46 AM PST by Qwapisking (Q: know the difference between a petulant 6 y.o. and a liberal? A:age. L.Star )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

A Russian general was killed by an exploding scooter in Moscow.


6 posted on 12/19/2024 4:20:39 AM PST by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian Griffin

sounds like a Bourne killer did this dastardly deed.


7 posted on 12/19/2024 4:29:03 AM PST by Qwapisking (Q: know the difference between a petulant 6 y.o. and a liberal? A:age. L.Star )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Brian Griffin

Scooters should be banned.


8 posted on 12/19/2024 5:12:53 AM PST by MtnClimber (For photos of scenery, wildlife and climbing, click on my screen name for my FR home page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber
Even if it ‘saves one life,’...

It saves countless lives every day... in ways they refuse to comprehend.

9 posted on 12/19/2024 5:13:16 AM PST by alancarp (George Orwell was an optimist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Molon labe.


10 posted on 12/19/2024 5:31:08 AM PST by bk1000 (Banned from Breitbart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

The Maoists at Rat Party Headquarters say that there’s an overwhelming tidal wave of opposition to the 2nd Amendment in this country. If that’s true then the solution is easy: amend the Constitution. It shouldn’t take much more than 6 months to get both Houses of Congress to approve an amendment repealing the 2nd Amendment and then have 38 state legislatures vote to approve this amendment.


11 posted on 12/19/2024 5:31:26 AM PST by Gay State Conservative (Import The Third World,Become The Third World)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

a close read of the 2nd Amendment says they can’t even do that. SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED is a statement that means what it says so any attempt, of ANY KIND, to change it in any way, shape or form is a defacto “infringement “ and therefore illegal to do. “it takes a lawyer to tell you that a law doesn’t mean what you think it means no matter HOW it’s written”. 1000 lawyers at the bottom of the sea isn’t even CLOSE to a good start.


12 posted on 12/19/2024 5:46:09 AM PST by Qwapisking (Q: know the difference between a petulant 6 y.o. and a liberal? A:age. L.Star )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Qwapisking

“We have to take words and twist them to mean what ever we want. We’re lawyers. That’s our job” Aly McBeal


13 posted on 12/19/2024 5:53:32 AM PST by bert ( (KE. NP. +12) Where is ZORRO when California so desperately needs him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Qwapisking
OK..if an amendment repealing the 2nd Amendment is passed it seems possible...maybe even likely...that the constitutionality of that amendment would be challenged in the Federal courts. If that happens it seems that the case would eventually wind up at SCOTUS.

And they would decide if the challenge has merit.

14 posted on 12/19/2024 6:26:35 AM PST by Gay State Conservative (Import The Third World,Become The Third World)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Qwapisking

Since when do members of America’s native born criminal class give a fatrat rectum about the Constitution.


15 posted on 12/19/2024 1:54:27 PM PST by Nebr FAL owner (Treason is the reason for Democrat Sedition & subvertion )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson