I dunno and I dunno and I dunno.
The ballistics and other forensics might be fake. There was a “magic bullet” that one secret service guy says he snagged and wrote a book about. Dunno dunno dunno.
Only thing to do is hear this fellow out. If he has done other interviews, listen to those, too, and compare them.
I believe the autopsy of Roseanne Boyland was fake, because I saw the footage of her prostrate on the ground right outside the tunnel where everyone was tear gassed, and a police woman is beating on her prostrate body with a stick. But the autopsy only says that she died of an OD, and the pathologist unilaterally cremated her.
If that’s what the deep state does to cover up the murder (?) of a lowly dead right-wing extremist at the Capitol, what do you think they might do to the forensics of a President’s assassination.
Oh, he is an extremely credible witness. Like I say, I’d probably be sold on another shooter if not for the ballistics.
Reading “Plausible Denial” updated now. The conspiracy theories have a net tactic though: after all these years of demanding docs (which so far have no real smoking gun and in fact cast more shade on the CUBANS than anyone), the new conspiracy theory approach is “doesn’t matter if they release all the docs and the docs don’t show anything-—of course they don’t show anything because the CIA doctored all of them.” There gets a point when you can’t say every piece of evidence except human (fallible) eyewitness testimony is valid.