I think it was obvious that this killing was a response to a loved one whose medical claim was denied, and they died as a result. For it has all the earmarks of a revenge killing, to me at least.
That has been my impression from the start. Nothing else fits, but with that much money being thrown around, nothing is out of the question.
I am betting the care was denied to a child with a serious illness needing ongoing type care!! Parents become full of RAGE when it comes to their kids!!
Revenge killing is the first thing I thought of but words scrawled on a bullet might be meant to misleadingly point to revenge I’d look good and hard at the missus. That shooting looked fairly amateur though.
Re: Post 51
I think it was obvious that this killing was a response to a loved one whose medical claim was denied, and they died as a result. For it has all the earmarks of a revenge killing, to me at least.
____________________________
Sound to me like your assessment is the correct one. Scratching the words on the cartridges tells me the guy was seething with anger over a medial claim denial that lead to the death of a loved one. The guy is likely former/present military/law enforcement by the way he handles and clears the weapon.
My bet it’s trans revenge. Mutilation denied.