These and earlier cables have upset NATO’s control of their influence in Baltic Sea, clearly an effort to weaken/challenge NATO alliances.
Think Ukraine, the need to realign NATO’s force posture, the need for a “radical reorientation” of NATO. Players would include China, Putin/Russia, potential “hybrid” warfare targeting key infrastructure in the West amid further escalations in the ongoing war in Ukraine.
“Our European security is not only under threat from Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine, but also from hybrid warfare by malicious actors. Safeguarding our shared critical infrastructure is vital to our security and the resilience of our societies,” https://cnbc.com/2024/11/28/explainer-baltic-sea-undersea-cable-cuts-stoke-geopolitical-tensions.html
From Politico https://politico.com/news/magazine/2024/07/02/nato-second-trump-term-00164517According According to these officials, the U.S. would keep its nuclear umbrella over Europe during a second Trump term by maintaining its airpower and bases in Germany, England and Turkey, and its naval forces as well. Meanwhile, the bulk of infantry, armor, logistics and artillery would ultimately pass from American to European hands. Parts of this plan were floated in an article published in February 2023 by the Trump-affiliated Center for Renewing America, but in the months since, there’s been an emerging and more detailed consensus among Trump supporters on an outline of a new concept for NATO.
Yeah, it’ complicated. The only guarantee...it is all about $$$. OUR money (US tax payor generated and confiscated by US govt.). They (European nations/NATO/Zelensky want it. Uniparty wants to take from us and give to them. Trump standing in their way.
My solution: US out of NATO and the UN.
MarQ