During the hearing, Elizondo was joined by several other witnesses, including Michael Shellenberger, who presented a report on a UAP program allegedly codenamed “Immaculate Constellation.”
The report asserts that the U.S. executive branch has been managing UAP intelligence for years without Congressional supervision.
According to Shellenberger, the program has amassed a significant amount of visual and sensor-based evidence, reportedly including “high-resolution photos” and direct observational data of UAPs. Shellenberger claimed there could be “hundreds, maybe thousands” of pieces of evidence withheld from the public, contrasting these high-quality images with the blurry visuals released in the past.
If a 747 crashed in Seville in the 15th century - would Columbus have flown to America? Not likely.
We would not have the scientific and manufacturing ability to reverse engineer alien technology.
Which congresscritters are participating in this hearing?
Thank you for your work in posting these threads.:-)
UFO/UAP ping
Luis Elizondo- my favorite mis-info guy after Lazar(o).
Since the 1940’s, we’ve heard the stories and since then all we get are stories and blurry black and white photos that look like they are from the 1800’s. Actually, the Victorians took better photos. it’s all 100% bs. There is actually more scientific proof for sasquatch. These fools want youtube hits and book sales. The government uses this nonsense to manipulate people. They need problems that are too big for individuals like global warming/cooling/climate change. Oh no, here come the space aliens. BS
"Claims". No evidence.
If the US reversed engineered something, how can there be a “Race” when there are no other contestants with the tech!??
Back in the early 2000's I worked on some pretty cutting-edge technology projects of the Top-Secret SCI variety (Lol! Nothing Alien that I'm aware of though). The thing is you could go out and do an internet search and find references to the program code names and discussions about them right out on the internet. The details were often wrong or incomplete, but the general gist of what the project was about was typically pretty spot on. Of course, the three-letter agency I worked for was NOT happy about this fact, but the general consensus was the best thing to do was simply ignore them as trying to quash them or have them taken down would have only added validity to them and got them spread further than the niche websites they were on.
Does anyone really believe that Lockheed hat the home grown tech to build the SR-71, an aircraft that started development in 1968?
Cover story for whatever they really are doing.
We’re not really this stupid, are we?
From the Kingdom of Nye, as Art Bell would say...
He was funny he had to be on something he never had dull moment I bet.