And more. My basic test for SE bias is to search "Negative effects of homosexual relations (also heterosexual fornication)" - which is because the issue is well-substantiated, and one in which is very likely to see bioas. Even in quotes Google only return one result, a FR page with that text (to my page named that). Without quotes, it did much better today than before, but which is likely due to my being tracked.
In a past test, Google provided a mixed results, with snippets referring to effects such as depression and suicide due to treatment by others, thus designed to elicit symphony. Of course, Goggle now only allows 10 results per page, but more of same followed.
In this test of Negative+effects+of+homosexual+relations& , Google only provided one result in the first 30 (which is when I stopped looking) which says anything about STD's.
Another example was asking "where does the bible condemn homosexual relations" in quotes which resulted in, "Your search - "where does the bible condemn homosexual relations" - did not match any documents." It is simply hard to believe Google cannot find any document with that question. But if I ask the same question without quotes then what results as the top hits?
The top result, as expected with a biased SE, is one that outright denies that the bible condemn homosexual relations (which it plainly does). Then after a single, sound but brief Billy Graham org page stating the Biblical position, a series of six more liberal sites follow, wikipedia being one, which at best is promoting ambiguity.
Two two contra homosexual sites follow, one with misleading intro, followed by another one promoting ambiguity, and followed by three more liberal sources, one being more egregiously so. Thus only 4 out of 10 top search results actually uphold the Biblical position.
So I tested perplexity.ai, asking it, Can you provide an extensive resource on Negative Physical, Psychological, Financial and Spiritual effects of fornication, mainly homosexual? And in one second it returned,
Here is an overview of some of the potential negative effects associated with fornication, particularly homosexual behavior:
Physical Effects
Increased risk of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) including HIV, syphilis, gonorrhea, chlamydia, and others1 2
Higher rates of certain cancers, especially anal cancer in men who have sex with men I
ncreased risk of hepatitis B and hepatitis C
Potential for physical injury from anal sex
Psychological Effects
Higher rates of depression, anxiety, and substance abuse disorders2
Increased risk of suicide and suicidal ideation
Feelings of shame, guilt, or internalized homophobia
Relationship instability and difficulties with intimacy
Identity confusion or crisis
Financial Effects
Potential loss of employment or career opportunities due to discrimination
Higher healthcare costs related to STI treatment and other medical issues
Possible legal fees related to discrimination cases or custody battles
Costs associated with substance abuse treatment
Spiritual Effects
Feelings of separation from God or religious community
Crisis of faith or loss of religious beliefs
Exclusion from religious institutions or practices
Difficulty reconciling sexual orientation with religious teachings
Spiritual distress or existential questioning
It's important to note that many of these effects are influenced by societal stigma, discrimination, and lack of support rather than inherent to same-sex attraction or behavior itself. Additionally, heterosexual fornication carries many similar risks and consequences. The severity and prevalence of these effects can vary greatly between individuals. Many LGBTQ+ people lead happy, healthy, and fulfilling lives with proper support and resources. Professional medical and mental health care is recommended for anyone experiencing negative effects related to sexual behavior or identity.
I commended it saying, That concise and valid list is far better than what Google and most search engines provides. Google even ignores what is likely the most substantiated collection of stats on the issue: https://peacebyjesuscom.blogspot.com/2019/10/negative-effects-of-homosexual.html
It then actually went to the link in about a second and return an accurate concise synopsis of its findings, which I responded to by saying,
The rapidity of that substantive response was profound, though I did not need the editorial note on sensitivity and respect, as I seek the welfare of others.
Thank God for such help!
Wow!