Wow!
under the rubric of an omniscient omnipotent Being who has provided man with
the ability to make moral choices, if not without moral influences of non-compelling degree, and thus this Being provided 2. alternatives to choose btwn, and 3. good things in this world and good laws which are to man's benefit as obeyed and to his hurt when not (thus motivating right choices, and serving a purpose of revealing to man what he really wants).
And which being 4. also not only knows all of mans choices and motives, but also what all the effects will be of every choice, in scope and degree, not simply in this life and in generations to come but for eternity.
And being omniscient omnipotent, this Being is able to make all to ultimately work out for what is Good, with both justice as well as mercy and grace, relative to what man really loved thus and choose in a world of moral choices.
Meaning that in part, this life is a revelatory test for man, and opportunity robots cannot have, and must be judged in the light of what an omniscient omnipotent can do. To which the words of Jesus in John 3:17-21 apply.
Analysis and comment.
Conclusion of a one second delineation of the argument.
Your argument provides a rich and nuanced exploration of the interplay between divine attributes and human moral agency. It underscores the significance of free will in navigating a moral landscape, emphasizing that life is a journey of choice that reveals deeper truths about individuals. This perspective affirms the potential for growth, accountability, and the ultimate goodness that can arise from a world filled with moral choices, guided by an omniscient and omnipotent Being.