"He said, she said" is not evidence of anything.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
To: E. Pluribus Unum
This is the best indicator yet that Trump is ahead in all the internal polling.
2 posted on
10/02/2024 3:56:42 PM PDT by
SamAdams76
(7,797,618 Truth | 91,192,773 Twitter)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Well, technically it is evidence. It’s just not compelling. The testimony of the prostitute in the Duke Lacrosse team case was “evidence”, but worthless and untrustworthy. Hence the final outcome.
3 posted on
10/02/2024 3:57:42 PM PDT by
cuban leaf
(2024 is going to be one for the history books, like 1939. And 2025 will be more so, like 1940-1945.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Just PROVES that Vance DESTROYED WALZ last night!!!
4 posted on
10/02/2024 3:58:34 PM PDT by
Ann Archy
(Abortion....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
That’s it?! He should be laughed out of court.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
I doubt there is anything in the filing that we haven’t already heard. Just a new spin on old news.
7 posted on
10/02/2024 3:59:46 PM PDT by
CaptainK
("No matter how cynical you get, it is impossible to keep up” -)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Here we go again...
Just like he “lunged at the steering wheel”...
To: E. Pluribus Unum
ANOTHER million votes for Trump.
9 posted on
10/02/2024 4:02:56 PM PDT by
Mark
(DONATE ONCE every 3 months-is that a big deal?)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Gee, right after Vance kicked Tampon Tims ass. What a coincidence.
And I just want to thank all the Republican AGs out there for helping out and indicting every last scumbag involved in the Russia collusion hoax. Trump merely questions an election which he has every right to do, and he gets indicted. Hillary and her crew lay a big fat one on the entire country costing millions in taxes, bankrupting innocent people, hindering a sitting POTUS from doing his job for 3 years, harming foreign relations, and not one of them gets even a parking ticket
10 posted on
10/02/2024 4:04:07 PM PDT by
GrandJediMasterYoda
(As long as Hillary Clinton remains free, the USA will never have equal justice under the law)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
This only shows how desperate the rat party is at this point.
11 posted on
10/02/2024 4:04:09 PM PDT by
No name given
( Anonymous is who you’ll know me as)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
LAWFARE
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Do they include where Trump said to go PEACEFULLY?
13 posted on
10/02/2024 4:05:29 PM PDT by
HereInTheHeartland
(Have you seen Joe Biden's picture on a milk carton?)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
To: E. Pluribus Unum
15 posted on
10/02/2024 4:09:02 PM PDT by
Chode
(there is no fall back position, there's no rally point, there is no LZ... we're on our own. #FJB)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Did the Moderators know in advance this was going to happen last night during the debate. It is odd the question they ask was pertinent.
16 posted on
10/02/2024 4:09:18 PM PDT by
FreedBird
(w)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Mr. Smith laid out extensive arguments for why that post on Twitter should be considered an unofficial act of a desperate losing candidate, rather than the official act of a president that would be considered immune from prosecution under a landmark Supreme Court ruling this summer. Okay, I'm still waiting for an explanation of how his post on Twitter is a crime whether an unofficial act or not so far I have seen nothing.
Can someone tell me what crime is being alleged here?
17 posted on
10/02/2024 4:13:41 PM PDT by
usurper
(AI was born with a birth defect.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Election interference defined, from the lawfare crowd that charge Trump with election interference. You can’t make this stuff up!!
18 posted on
10/02/2024 4:14:15 PM PDT by
blackdog
((Z28.310) Be careful what you say. Your refrigerator may be listening & reporting you.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
This is the first thing that comes up when googling when a sealed court filing can be unsealed, refers to some Epstein case, 2019, Second circuit court of appeals:
The Second Circuit also offered guidance to courts on how to PROTECT THE JUDICIAL PROCESS FROM BEING COOPTED TO PROMOTE SCANDAL ARISING OUT OF UNPROVEN AND POTENTIALLY LIBELOUS STATEMENTS It instructed that courts may:
Issue protective orders forbidding dissemination of certain materials and require that filings containing such material be submitted under seal.
Explain on the record that certain statements appear to lack credibility.
Strike material from filings under FRCP 20 because it is redundant, immaterial, impertinent, or scandalous.
Impose sanctions under FRCP 11(c).
20 posted on
10/02/2024 4:19:00 PM PDT by
sopo
To: E. Pluribus Unum
21 posted on
10/02/2024 4:19:28 PM PDT by
dfwgator
(Endut! Hoch Hech!)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
23 posted on
10/02/2024 4:27:07 PM PDT by
Ge0ffrey
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Chutkan should be removed from the bench and disbarred. Inexcusable judicial conduct that wreaks of Obamite desperation.
24 posted on
10/02/2024 4:28:10 PM PDT by
blackdog
((Z28.310) Be careful what you say. Your refrigerator may be listening & reporting you.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson