[2nd Amendment]

I have a different take on the debate. Of course I believe Vance had the policies right and did a great job. I did. I did not find Walz distasteful. He seems like a genuine sanguine guy who would be fun to go bowling with. Of course he’s a liberal democrat who has to support cackles.

[Mr. Jeeves]

Walz did outperform expectations - and Vance outperformed them even more. Walz put on the performance he was picked to give - selling Midwesterners on the idea that he and Harris are not radical Leftists at all, just plain folks who care about people like you. The MSM has tried since the day of his selection to portray Vance as an angry, radical, “weird”, religious zealot and he blew that caricature to smithereens.

I think the MSM will try to pretend that Vance does not exist from here on out. Interacting with him at all hurts their narrative too much.