Maybe you’re correct.
The subject is just so barbaric, I’m not good at it.
We should want to see the entire context, I agree, and to see if it brings some relief from the pro-abortion impression.
*Assuming* much of anything these days without full context can be a mistake, especially when it comes to Leftist news reporting by American and Western media sources.
My own interest was narowly focused, on the Catholic reaction, because the story broke for me from a Catholic website.
As for Melania’s “belief” [in Choice], the lipstick on her belief may have been colored by using the shade of “government coercion”, which Roe v Wade certainly favored, with 60 years of abortion freedom, until its logical conclusion eventually arrived in the state of Virginia, where that one legislator or governor was describing, unmercifully, how to perform infanticide on a born-alive, by neglect.
Catholic reaction to Melania’s quote was pretty swift and equally uncompromising, as was the Virginia “freedom” to infanticide statement.
Some things still defy argument.
Thx, 🙂
Rita
#918, in part:
>>613796
You are learning.
How many coincidences before it becomes mathematically impossible?
Wait until you learn who has been talking to you here.
Q
Many believe that Melania, having seen the systemic abuse of women and children in the fashion/entertainment industry, could be spearheading these angles within Q.
Highly Speculative.