Posted on 09/17/2024 5:37:46 PM PDT by Libloather
Those demands might have been “bizarre” in 1974.
Artificial perfumes are air pollution, imho. Everyone’s clothes are reeking of this sickening overly-perfumed laundry soap and dryer sheets. Entire streets have unbreathable air at times. It’s a thing.
Does that include "ethnic" scents like curry or dead fish?
Or more likely it means White scents like Old Spice and Chanel #5?
So no Mary Kay saleswomen, then.
Replace them all with scabs and AI.
I agree!
Not allowing perfume is unfair to the trans women, a dress alone isn’t always convincing enough to hide the smell of stale beer and chili dogs.
I’d say we could do without ‘em.
It seemed like the workplace was a lot saner when people could smoke indoors.
Smokes helped GIs on the battlefield (but I don’t think they do that anymore) and even beekeepers can quiet an aggravated nest with smoke.
Ban the bans and maybe sanity will return.
I like the way you think!
Normally, yes. But since it’s the New York Times, I would encourage the union to demand even more crazy stuff. For starters:
- Demand that every worker gets free slice of pizza every hour, the style of pizza to be determined by the employee. Include a free drink, too.
- Demand that every Wednesday be “Bingo Wednesday”. No one works on Wednesday afternoons. Instead everyone plays bingo. Each game will have a $100 cash prize, paid by the employer.
As both a student and a professor I am in agreement with the ban on strong smelling perfumes etc. Several colleagues and an dozens of my students have had alergic reactions including hives, swelling, itching etc.
I'm looking forward to the news reports of mass suffocation on all these unbreathable streets.
How many of NYT’s software engineers are from out of the country?
I could not agree with you more. There’s just nothing wrong with pure clean air. This is one demand of the NYT’s union I agree with.
I really think that people should think about the issue in broad terms, as I think you have highlighted. Basically, I see the "sensitive people" thinking like this:
You did something at home.
Now you smell.
I don't like it.
I demand that you change.
Some people would nod if they think the topic is using Perfume as someone gets ready for work. But if the topic is foreign cuisine, then all of a sudden the "sensitive" person looks more like an Oppressor.
I think people ought to stop trying to control others. Perfume isn't illegal. You ought to be able to wear it in the workplace.
I agree with the ban on scents. Everything else is BS.
Worked in Silicon Valley before it went to hell. The line workers were typically Philipino women who had various microwaved fish parts for lunch. A lot of people headed out of the building for lunch. I’m sure they’d burn the place down if fish were banned.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.