[MtnClimber]

I question if “undecided voters” will see the bias that was on display.

[MortMan]

Expect @realDonaldTrump backers will claim it was 3 vs 1, but you know you lost the game when you end up complaining about the refs.

Sometimes the refs really ARE biased, Mr. Haass. One or two bad calls in a game isn't sign of bias, but of humanity. When the entire game is filled with one-sided bad calls is when bias gets identified.

Actually, the problem with the two moderators was less the uneven fact-checking than consistent lack of follow-ups to unanswered questions.

No, Mr. Haass. That the "fact-checking" involved outright lies by the moderators make the lack of follow-up pale in comparison. The questions ignoring the elephant in the democrat room - being when did Kamala know Joe was unfit, and why she lied about his state - is almost as egregious.

The moderators letting Kamala slide with word salad flambe in place of meaningful responses simply shows that the mods don't believe the voters deserve to be informed. The other two issues show the mods believe that voters deserve to be lied to.

[DeplorablePaul]

I think the display of an obviously vacuous Kamala reinforced the idea that she is acting and an Obama puppet. Usually there is a big shift in polling close to election day. I predict a big shift away from the Dems as people will go for the authentic Donald Trump.

[blitz128]

They are not “Kamala supporters “, just ask them. They can’t name one thing she has done, besides “there are too many to name”
Then can’t name one

They are dem supporters or anyone but Trump types

It is obvious they are brain dead lemmings, like when they are given dem quotes that are attributed to Trump and of course condemn them…, but when told they are from Kamala, xiden, Obama, Schumer…. The reaction is always silence, deer in the headlights look, then “I guess I need to do more research “

[joethedrummer]

Nice thoughts but.. this was not a football game. - it was SUPPOSED to be a debate; a discussion between TWO candidates..

Apples & Oranges…

[Salman]

Presupposes a fair election.

[GOPJ]

...

Rich Noyes at the Media Research Center observed... charted 100% positive coverage of Kamala Harris while coverage of Donald Trump was 93% negative.

In other words, the moderators were hopelessly compromised before the candidates even took the stage ... As Mark Penn and Andrew Stein write at the Wall Street Journal, upon their reviewing and comparing notes, they “became concerned about the role of ABC News and what it did to our democracy.

The moderators, who were supposed to be neutral referees, had decided in advance that they were going to ‘fact check’ Mr. Trump but not Ms. Harris.”

The only time Harris is 'on fire' and speaking well is when she's expressing hatred and contempt. She's never funny or light hearted or logical or intellectual - but when it comes to hatred - contempt, looking down on others - her eyes light up with evil. Same with her sonority sister...

[MuttTheHoople]

Richard Haass has never been to an Alabama football game.