| In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Answer to a media question | Putin answered a question from a media representative. [Media blackout on key part of Putin's statement], lodi90 wrote: |
No, the correct analogy is Mexico invading California and “annexing” Los Angeles into Mexico. Surely, you don’t suggest we surrender there? It’s Russia who is dropping bombs and genocidally erasing the cities of its neighbor for over two years now. Annexing entire cities that its invading bandit army haven’t even occupied. That is genuinely indefensible conduct in any context. Everybody wants peace here. Except for the colonialist mass murderers in the Kremlin who use violence and murder to advance a political agenda. And it’s duped useful fools, apparently. |
Wrong. The correct analogy is China overthrowing the Mexican government, building and equiping an army and provoking the US to fight. Within 3 or 4 days of the CIA/US State Department overthrow of the Ukraine, Putin annexed areas on its border. Don't worry about those annexed areas - that's where the Ukrainians of Russian descent live, so the Western Ukraine was shelling Eastern Ukraine to cleanse it's gene pool (See their Constitution, it speaks of genetic purity).
Everybody wants peace? After Zelensky attacked the Kursk nuclear power plant and had mercenaries firing on civilians?! The Ukrainians are puppets and NATO wants war, war war.
There you go again disenfranching 40 million Ukrainians in the exact manner Democrats try to do to patriotic Americans. You take umbrage at Ukraine for choosing Russian targets while giving to pass to a bandit “nation” that has ALREADY stolen a nuclear power plant located in Ukraine. There is just no intellectual consistency to your arguments. Therefore, there really isn’t a purpose to continue this conversation. FRegards.