Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Penelope Dreadful

(You said, “The term-of-art words “natural-born Citizen” are not found anywhere within the 14th Amendment nor Federal Statute 8 U.S. Code § 1401.”

Hmmm. I could just swear I have heard those words before. . .

LIGHTBULBS! Wong Kim Ark!)

Wong was never affirmed a natural born Citizen. He was affirmed a 14th Amendment Citizen based on his parents legal US domicile at his birth. Kamala’s parents weren’t legal US residents nor did they have permanent domicile. Anchor babies aren’t legal US natural born citizens.


41 posted on 09/08/2024 12:36:16 PM PDT by Macho MAGA Man (The last two wen't balloons. One was a cylindrical objecwhots Trump is being given the Alex Jones tr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]


To: Macho MAGA Man

Dream on, Dude. They are the same thing. As if, you didn’t know. Once again, from Wong Kim Ark:

“The foregoing considerations and authorities irresistibly lead us to these conclusions: the Fourteenth Amendment affirms the ancient and fundamental rule of citizenship by birth within the territory, in the allegiance and under the protection of the country, including all children here born of resident aliens, with the exceptions or qualifications (as old as the rule itself) of children of foreign sovereigns or their ministers, or born on foreign public ships, or of enemies within and during a hostile occupation of part of our territory, and with the single additional exception of children of members of the Indian tribes owing direct allegiance to their several tribes. The Amendment, in clear words and in manifest intent, includes the children born, within the territory of the United States, of all other persons, of whatever race or color, domiciled within the United States. Every citizen or subject of another country, while domiciled here, is within the allegiance and the protection, and consequently subject to the jurisdiction, of the United States. His allegiance to the United States is direct and immediate, and, although but local and temporary, continuing only so long as he remains within our territory, is yet, in the words of Lord Coke in Calvin’s Case, 7 Rep. 6a, “strong enough to make a natural subject, for if he hath issue here, that issue is a natural-born subject;” and his child, as said by Mr. Binney in his essay before quoted, “if born in the country, is as much a citizen as the natural-born child of a citizen, and by operation of the same principle.”

BTW, this response is NOT really to You, because you guys are like Sovereign Citizens, and there is no amount of logic, reasoning, or legal holdings that will ever change your mind.

This is for anybody foolish enough to not know better, and who thinks you guys know what you are talking about. Which, you don’t.

Two citizen parent birthers equal sovereign citizens lite.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gAumt46ocyc&t=16s


59 posted on 09/08/2024 2:54:36 PM PDT by Penelope Dreadful (And there is Pansies, that's for Thoughts. +Sodomy & Abortion are NOT cornerstones of Civilization! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson