Tucker interviews interesting and diverse people. He lets them say their piece or hang themselves with their own rope.
That doesn’t mean he buys what they are selling or supports their views. More “journalists” should do the same.
That doesn’t mean he buys what they are selling or supports their views. More “journalists” should do the same.
It just means he’s a poor judge of what constitutes a “good historian”.
I get some of the points he makes, and might agree on some of them, but he ruins his credibility with idiotic statements.
One can claim Carlson didn't say Churchill was responsible. But he didn't disagee either.