Posted on 09/03/2024 4:22:24 PM PDT by Miami Rebel
Darryl Cooper, the historian deemed by Tucker Carlson to be the “best and most honest” in the U.S., appears to have a strange fondness for Adolf Hitler.
Cooper recently joined Carlson on an episode of The Tucker Carlson Show. During their conversation, Cooper claimed that Winston Churchill was the “chief villain” of World War II because he “was primarily responsible for that war becoming what it did.” He also claimed that the Holocaust was some kind of unintended consequence of Germany being “completely unprepared to deal with the millions and millions of prisoners of war.” According to Cooper, millions “ended up dead” because there was no food to feed them and German soldiers decided it was “more humane to just finish them off quickly.”
Based on his social media activity, that whitewashing of the atrocities of the Holocaust isn’t out of the ordinary for Cooper. In a now-deleted tweet from late July, he appeared to claim that scenes of Nazi-occupied France — specifically, a photo of Hitler before the Eiffel Tower — were “preferable” when compared to the scenes of the Olympic opening ceremony in Paris.
“This may be putting it too crudely for some,” he said, “but the picture on the left was infinitely preferable in virtually every way than the one on the right.”
[Hitler in Paris was on the left, the Olympics' opening tableau on the right.]
The month before, he posted a bizarre tweet suggesting that the shooter who tried to assassinate Donald Trump went to Hell and Hitler did not.
"Yes, Tucker's favorite historian is pretty open about being a Hitler guy, and he believes the Allies were on the wrong side of WWII.
"Not sure how this is America first. I don't speak Nazi. pic.twitter.com/bQ4fxpiym4
"— Jordan Schachtel @ dossier.today (@JordanSchachtel) September 3, 2024"
[Cooper's tweet: "If you're having a bad day, just remember that Trump's shooter is wandering around Hell looking for Hitler while the two guys dropped by Kyle Rittenhouse figure out how to break the news to him."]
In another tweet from June 2023, Cooper responded to someone arguing Hitler and Italian dictator Benito Mussolini were prime examples that “centralization of power is never a good idea.” Cooper replied with several screenshots of Wikipedia entries of civil wars across the world, claiming “a thousand years of tyranny is preferable to a single day of anarchy.”
"Here are but a few examples where centralized power would’ve been very welcome. As the Arab proverb goes, a thousand years of tyranny is preferable to a single day of anarchy. https://t.co/3LnMNphysn pic.twitter.com/RKLhaJzRQV
"— Martyr Made (@martyrmade) June 18, 2023"
Nazism was Marxism applied to race.
I’m just about certain that Tucker’s favorite historian is Victor Davis Hanson.
Personally, I’m anti hitler. And your post makes no sense.
Yep,Churchill, Stalin, and Roosevelt seemed so happy with one another in Yalta. But we all know the media does not lie.
It is too bad General Patton was not “allowed” to come home.
Tucker has lauded other sketchy people in the past.
Here’s an opinion piece regarding some of it:
https://cufi.org/issue/how-joe-rogan-tucker-carlson-berkeley-and-wellesley-mainstream-anti-semitism
I’ve noticed it independently from this as has a FReeper friend.
Ah, the Rhineland. It was the first of Hitler’s many aggressive territorial moves. I forgot about that. Thanks.
Britain had no choice, up to 1939, the belief was that Hitler just wanted to unite Germans.
But the real goal Hitler wanted was to make sure there would be no states to the East that would be allied with Britain and France, which in Hitler’s mind meant that Germany would be “surrounded”, and that’s why he occupied the rest of Czechoslovakia. Without the Sudetenland, Czechoslovakia was defenseless.
Hitler had held out hope that perhaps Poland, driven by their hatred of the Soviets, would ally with Germany.
But after seeing what the Germans did in Czechoslovakia, Poland was determined to not suffer Czechoslovakia’s fate, and even secured a part of the former Czechoslovakia that was mostly populated by Poles.
On top of that, Britain and France were determined that they weren’t going to repeat Munich ever again. They already had egg on their faces, as it is. So they made the deal to “guarantee” Poland’s safety (although they knew if the Germans attacked they could never hope to save Poland).
Hitler was not as bad as who?
Hitler’s number one goal was to kill Jews. The second one was to concor the USSR.
It’s really simple:
The neomarxists and Islamomarxists capitalize on the Jew-hatred, using it to indoctrinate the retarded into their dialectic. You see if you go far enough left you end up coming back around to the far right, or more simply put the far left and far right are 2 sides to the same coin. With that, the new Marxists have adopted a lot of fascistic tendencies, and ultimately that makes the “Hitler was right” crowd yet another ignorant subset of the progressive movement, in their quest to bring about the leftist utopia.
You lie like a Ukie.
That's exactly what happened in post 63...
Or how about this:
The natural progression of communalists (towards their utopia) is socialism-> communism-> marxism-> leninism-> great leap forward-> etc etc etc but the Marxists wrote about how things progressed forward and it always started with forms of socialism. And socialism is inherently fascist, it’s the state control of the means of production, and the culture, and everything else. So if left unchecked, fascism eventually progresses towards communism. But the communism will then have that fascism baked in. There’s no going back, in fact that’s the bedrock of communism. You never go back. So even if you think the fascists were fighting the communists, it was only because the fascists were slow on the uptake and just not at the communism stage yet.
Lol.
You prove my point.
All you care about is Ukraine and Russia crap.
I had to think a while what is a “Ukie.” A ukulele? An Okie?
You’re obsessed.
I think it’s your job.
Comprehension is an asset if you possess it.
You’re making connections, only problem is, you have a conclusion and fit the narrative to reach it.
Actually, I'm quite active in vote fraud and Article III federal judge topics.
So you lie like a squeeze-licking Ukie cheerleader.
I'm curious why double-digit IQ window-lickers like yourself bother to post on FR.
Do you get a participation gold star?
You could ask him to no longer post to you because he seems to respect that.
He may, however, follow you around and post about you like the obsessive little troll that he is.
I have mental images of him sucking on his favorite blankie while spitting venom at President Trump, and writing letters to his Mistress Kammy, begging permission to suck her delectable toes...
Post 79 is an example of the obsessive posting I was referring to, just fyi.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.