Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: The Duke

PCR is highly accurate at detecting its base pair targets present in SARS CoV 2.

The problem is that the clinical virology and natural history of the infection are poorly understood.

Antigen testing in the clinical setting is more useful.


32 posted on 09/01/2024 5:16:14 PM PDT by Jim Noble (Assez de mensonges et de phrases)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: Jim Noble

“PCR is highly accurate at detecting its base pair targets present in SARS CoV 2.”

As someone who has spent time developing novel tests for detection of biothreat agents, I can tell you that a test is only useful if it is specific for the target. If it reacts to similar organisms or molecules, it will give a false positive result. The covid PCR test was garbage as it gave false positives with other common viruses, especially when they ran too many cycles. It’s as if they wanted to as many positive reactions as positive.
First responders would rather have false Negatives than false positives, because false positives trigger panic and all sorts of response requirements that waste time and resources.


38 posted on 09/01/2024 6:26:39 PM PDT by Brooklyn Attitude (DemoncRATS have always been the Jackass party, now they are also the Hamas party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Noble

Thank you so much for your insights on this.


53 posted on 09/01/2024 8:23:57 PM PDT by The Duke (Not without incident)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson