AI AIN'T ALWAYS WOKE: Perplexity.ai's response when asked about self-deception by students regarding the one of the fundamental principles of DEI--Equality of Outcome (Vanity)

[RoosterRedux]

I thought some of you might find this interesting. It looks like AI might be coming around to reality.

I use AI every day and have learned to trick it into overcoming any "sensitivities" it may have regarding popular Woke-related issues. I have found that the key to getting a straight answer is asking questions that force the AI platform to address the question from a purely logical POV or by addressing the pros and cons of an issue.

Below is an example of how Perplexity.ai did a fine job of telling the truth about "Equality of Outcome" which is a primary principle of both DEI and Marxism/communism/collectivism.

I was impressed at how Perplexity.ai had no problem getting to the heart of the issue and telling the truth (despite what we hear about its biased programming).

My second question may sound like a repeat of the first, but I wanted to see if Perplexity would have any difficulty admitting that there are no advantages to "equality of outcome." As you will see, it didn't.

Here is my dialogue with Perplexity:

Rooster to Perplexity:

I'm writing an article to explore the pros and cons of self-deception in college students who initially believe that equality of outcome is beneficial because 'everyone wins,' but later realize it's detrimental as it lowers overall achievement by removing competition from the learning process. What are your thoughts on this?"

Perplexity:

That's an interesting and thought-provoking topic for an article. Here are some thoughts on exploring the potential benefits and detriments of self-deception around equality of outcomes in college students:

Potential Benefits of Self-Deception

• It may provide a sense of security and belonging for students who struggle academically if they believe everyone will get the same outcome regardless of effort.

• Self-deception could boost confidence and motivation for weaker students who think they can achieve the same as top performers without putting in extra work.

• Believing equality of outcome is good may reduce stress and pressure to compete and excel.

Potential Detriments of Self-Deception

• Students may lose the drive to reach their full potential if they think outcomes are guaranteed regardless of performance.

• Removing the element of competition could lead to an overall decline in academic achievement as students have less incentive to push themselves.

• Self-deception around equality of outcomes may create unrealistic expectations that are shattered upon entering the real world post-graduation.

• It could promote a sense of entitlement and an unwillingness to accept that success requires hard work and merit.

Balancing Perspectives

The article could explore how self-deception provides short-term comfort but long-term detriment. While equality of opportunity is important, self-deception around equality of outcome may be detrimental to student development and achievement. Highlighting both the potential benefits and detriments, with examples and data, could make for a thought-provoking article that challenges readers to think critically about the role of competition and merit in education. Providing a balanced perspective is key. Let me know if you would like me to elaborate on any part of this or if you have additional questions as you write your article. I'm happy to provide further insights.

Rooster:

Do you think self-deception regarding equality of outcome is a bad choice for students and colleges in the long run? You mention that such self-deception is a problem when students graduate and face the reality outside college.

Perplexity:

Yes, self-deception regarding equality of outcome can be a problematic choice for students and colleges in the long run. Here are several reasons why this self-deception may lead to negative consequences:

Long-Term Consequences of Self-Deception

1. Misalignment with Reality

• Workplace Expectations:

In the professional world, outcomes are often determined by merit, effort, and competition. Students who have been led to believe that everyone will achieve the same success regardless of their contributions may struggle to adapt to environments where performance is evaluated based on individual achievement.

• Disappointment and Frustration:

Graduates may experience a harsh reality shock when they enter the job market and find that their degrees do not guarantee equal outcomes. This can lead to feelings of disappointment, frustration, and even disillusionment.

2. Reduced Motivation and Initiative

• Lack of Drive: If students believe that effort does not significantly affect outcomes, they may become complacent, leading to a lack of motivation to excel academically or professionally. This complacency can stifle personal growth and hinder the development of essential skills.

• Decreased Resilience: Students who do not learn to cope with competition and setbacks may struggle to develop resilience. In the real world, challenges and failures are common, and the ability to bounce back is crucial for success.

3. Undermining Meritocracy

• Erosion of Standards:

If colleges prioritize equality of outcome over merit, it may lead to a dilution of academic standards. This can create environments where mediocrity is accepted, ultimately diminishing the value of education.

• Impact on Collaboration: A culture that emphasizes equal outcomes may discourage collaboration and healthy competition among students. The absence of competition can limit the exchange of ideas and innovation, which thrive in environments that challenge individuals to improve.

4. Societal Implications

• Workforce Preparedness: If a significant number of graduates enter the workforce with unrealistic expectations about success, it can have broader implications for organizational productivity and economic growth. Employers may find themselves having to invest more in training to bring new hires up to speed.

• Cultural Attitudes: A societal belief in equal outcomes without regard for effort may contribute to a culture of entitlement, where individuals expect rewards without corresponding contributions. This can lead to social tensions and dissatisfaction.

Conclusion

In summary, while self-deception regarding equality of outcome may provide short-term comfort and a sense of fairness, it can have detrimental effects on students' long-term development and success. Encouraging a mindset that values effort, competition, and personal accountability is essential for preparing students for the realities of life beyond college.

By fostering an environment that promotes both equality of opportunity and individual achievement, colleges can better equip students for the challenges they will face in their careers and lives.

[RoosterRedux]

I didn’t actually have to force it to logically respond. All it takes is a little nudge.

[RoosterRedux]

I noticed that I used the word "force" in my opening comment (at the very top). I should have probably used another word (like "tricked").;-)

You can't really force AI to do anything, but you can trick it into forgetting about any preprogrammed bias.

[sauropod]

Bkmk