Posted on 08/21/2024 11:05:17 AM PDT by CDR Kerchner
I guess you were advising the same thing when John McCain ran against Obama. You see where that strategy of yours got McCain and via the usurpation of office by Obama, what has become of our country and constitutional republic.
Without our Constitution and its enforcement we will no longer have a country. One must enforce the true original intent, meaning, understanding and purpose of the term “natural born Citizen” of the United States found only in the presidential eligibility clause of the U.S. Constitution. It is a national security protection term. It’s purpose was to insure the person who would be Commander in Chief of our military forces once the founding generation was gone would have to be born with sole allegiance to the USA; not a dual-Citizen at birth like Kamala Harris who inherited Jamaican citizenship at birth from her Jamaican national Marxist father sojourning in the USA temporarily on a student VISA.
For more on the original intent and meaning of the nbC term in Article II, see: http://www.kerchner.com/protectourliberty/naturalborncitizen/TheWhoWhatWhenWhereWhyandHowofNBC-WhitePaper.pdf
This needs to be debated and not ignored or censored by the likes of Google and Google owned YouTube and other high-tech social media platforms that are totally biased for the Dems which it comes to political free speech.
Do that and the Deep State will swap in Moochelle.
The law even covers Foundlings.
Drop the baby off at the fire station's Safe Haven baby drop box and it's a US citizen at birth THROUGH the law.
The child would be a citizen, though not a natural born citizen. A natural born citizen doesn't need a grant of citizenship through a law. An anchor baby does.
Trump has a tiny penis
Through what power? For instance, by legislative power or by decree.
Barry Sotero was never eligible, but they were hell bent to put him in there, and started the “birtherism” schtick. I brought it up in a few discussions and the consensus on the left was they didn’t care. They won’t care about Harris either and will eagerly vote for her because she isn’t Trump, and it would be another opportunity to “be on the right side of history” 🤮
That thread is over here...Pervert: Obama Mocks Size of Trump’s Manhood
“treated” but not true.
“The adjective “natural”...
Note that “naturally” born was used by the poster, not natural born.
Give no wriggle room with deception.”
I just want to know if her mommy had a c-section. Surely that would end this debate.
It was a painful birth with abundant, horrible, writhing sarcasm.
Exactly. There’s an extremely strong correlation between persons of foreign parentage and destructive policies implemented by those persons when they gain power.
In the US we have a now-trashed rule; elsewhere (e.g UK, Scotland, Ireland) with not even paper restrictions the dissolution of the nation rushes on recklessly.
“Is there any doubt about that?”
No doubt there but it’s not a
question of whwre she was
born, but to whom.
Both of her parents were not
american citizens when she
was born, which, by
definition, makes her a
naturalized citizen, not
natural born.
I have battled & battled over the NBC provision ever since Obama.
———————————
And yet you lose, and you lose, and you lose every battle. Over such a trivial non-issue.
You got that right. NBC kooks like Kerchner could care less about The border or the economy or any other critical issue. All they care about is there single issue fixation on such a stupid concept
Simply by practice.
The federal, state and local governments treat anchor babies as citizens. No one stopped this practice, so now it's accepted law.
Sometimes practice evolves into custom, and custom into law. Simply because no one put a stop to it.
Do some homework.
First, being born ‘of the soil’ does not grant citizenship in the US. Only Canada does that.
Citizenship comes thru the parents.
At birth, Kamala parents had not renounced the citizenship of their home countries. As such, she was Indian and Jamaican and potentially American, at birth.
Having more than one choice disqualifies her as a natural born citizen.
Problem is, there already exists law against anchor babies.
Ignoring the law doesn’t nullify it... it just reduces the integrity of your country and it’s ability to be a nation of laws
If you don't know then just say so. Nobody will hold you to blame for your ignorance (lack of knowledge).
You're not stupid no matter what the Democrats want you to believe about yourself.
Sadly, "everybody knows that..." means most people don't have a clue.
Allow me...ArtI.S8.C18.8.1 Overview of Congress's Immigration Powers
And through that Consitutional power, Congress enacted USC 8 (ALIENS AND NATIONALITY) which includes CHAPTER 12—IMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY.
That law, that Chapter and specifically Section 1401 of that Chapter, grants citizenship to chidren born of aliens who are born in the US. Once that birth certificate is done it's a done deal. Anchor baby!
8 FAM 300 U.S. Citizenship and Nationality
8 FAM 301.1 Acquisition by Birth in the United States
Do take the time to read that as well..Note that it is STATUTE (through laws) authority...
U.S. laws governing the acquisition of citizenship at birth embody two legal principles...
They're citizens with the same rights as natural born except for the right, and honor, to run for POTUS though their children may one day.
As always, JMO, YMMV
May you be soon disabused of such nonsense through my prior reply to you.
For such an otherwise seemingly intelligent person to brush this issue of as a nothing burger amazes me.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.