No but his companies are the biggest private contractor for government aka the state, which fits the definition of corporatism. Corporatism is the merger of state and corporate power.
Musk views on oil and gas are the typical democrat climate change “.....his goal is some future event that he can’t summarize because he is basing things on a political ideology not supportive facts for oil and gas.” While at the same time receiving subsidies for Tesla and carbon credits to sell. His companies are the classic example of corporatism. Tesla would not be a viable company without help from government via the subsidies and carbon credits or at a minimum would be a niche player with a significantly smaller market value.
He showed his Climate Change colors when he implied that the ooil would run out at some time-certain in the future.
#AbioticOil
A mass-balance calculation (Chevron did one in the early 1980s) proves it.