Posted on 07/31/2024 10:41:19 AM PDT by RummyChick
” Would he have had time to move the way you describe?”
There was two seconds between the third and fourth shot so maybe he had time if he rolled four times to end up between the expelled cases but I don’t know.
Everything about this case is really screwed up and doesn’t make sense.
I haven’t heard an explanation about the photo of Crooks body that shows a bullet wound to his right calf with the bullet going in from toward his foot and exiting near his knee.
This is going to sound really crazy but with local law enforcement saying the SS told them to be on the ground floor of that building and having photos taken from there.... and having public witnesses saying they saw snipers in the window of the 2nd floor.... could the snipers in the window of the 2nd floor have been working with Crooks - maybe to take out the sniper team on the roof behind Trump? And maybe they shot Crooks in the leg.
I know almost nothing about firearms and I’m 3D-impaired so I don’t know what to make of all the claims. What I do know is that 2+2 does not equal 7, and that’s what the officials are asking us to believe.
Not a smidgeon of a doubt in my mind that this was an inside job. Just 3 questions remain: What actually happened? Who ordered the hit? Who all knew about it?
How hard is it to roll with a loaded gun over a roof with substantial ribbing to roll over? And why would he do it?
“Everything about this case is really screwed up and doesn’t make sense.”
Also, how did his body and gun end up so far apart? Crooks and his gun must have been apart before the head shot took him out.
What Congress needs to do is sequester all of the people involved in security that day and then bring them all in at the same time and have them cross-examine each other. Let them fight it out in public over who is telling the truth and who is lying.
Then get all the video footage from attendees and all of the communications of every kind and find out who is really telling the truth.
“how did his body and gun end up so far apart?”
Well the roof is REALLY steep.
Anyoneon security/countersniper duty would have seen someone scuttling around on a roof instantly.
What they look for. The impulse shooter.
A real pro would be hidden and motionless in their hide.
The comment came from his interview with George Stephanopoulos.
Because he was being fired upon by the sniper...
=====================================
Yup. A couple of weeks ago I questioned if that s.s. counter sniper hadn't been shot at, but at that time, the water-tower (& not the trees) was the prevailing thought on location. [#59][#92]
The analysis done in that video you posted (by the same guy I quoted in #59) is absolutely amazing and well worth the watch.
Has there been any photos released of this allegation?
Because the kid didn't take any shots.
Assassin #1 was in the trees (roughly in front of the water tower) firing sub-sonic rounds at the North S.S. counter sniper team (why that shooter ducks down from his scope, his position was being fired on). The newest video that was released (that was initially confiscated by the FBI) has the audio signatures.
Assasin #2, allegedly who's picture is known, was positioned in the window below Crooks <>(where we see the muzzle flash in the new video). He likely had 2 rifles. One that he used to take 3 shots at Trump that everyone hears, who's bullets were shot from a slightly depressed elevation (3 feet) while standing (why he wasn't as accurate) and why those bullets didn't go past Trump an into the 1st row stands but instead went into the upper/back row of the stand behind Trump. The wind was moving right to left at about 10-12 mph, which is why the shots wound up where they did. The other rifle he used had sub-sonic ammo.
There are several sub-sonic shots that can be heard after the President is moved off the stage.
Crooks was killed by the South S.S. counter sniper team in the middle of it all, having been alerted by the North S.S. counter sniper team that they were taking shots.
Crooks looked up without his rifle in hand, without having taken a shot, and was taken out. The patsy.
All of that is talked about in the video Swirl posted above.
The ballistics, angles, video, sound evidence all make a compelling analysis.
https://rumble.com/v592bhg-multiple-shooters-john-cullen-and-clay-martin-tpc-1538.html
It was in the long video of the first local cops to the body. Early in the video the cops, with the body camera, was told to watch out for the case shells.
He looks around, points and counts out five that are right of the body.
Toward the end of the video the cop in the orange gloves states that there are shells all around the body and the cop, with the camera, counts out eight shells. Three that are left of Crooks and the five shell cases he had counted before on Crooks right.
Do you have a link to that cop video showing the shell casings around the dead Crooks?
“citizens are by passing USSS and FBI and sending video directly to Senators and Congressman.”
Ron Johnson, Eli Crane, and Corey Mills seem to be the ones most involved in collecting all info possible and finding the truth. Of course, Sneaker Johnson refused to let Crane and Mills on the committee — two actual sharp shooters in elite military.
“Yes, they knew him.”
And yes, they groomed him. His Guidance Counselor said that “something happened to him during the two years after he left high school”. I guess we know what that was.
Seems a waste of time to spend all that time creating a tool they could use just to shoot him later. Dead man tell no tales.
This is an interesting thought. Wonder if it could ever be proved?
Not the SS ...Crooks a live at home 20 y/o...outsmarted them all.
The video is at:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hzus2Ilw-mg&rco=1&ab_channel=SenChuckGrassley
The first count is at 7:50
the last count is at 26:55
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.