“celebrate inclusivity, diversity”
Not true, as their definition of “diversity” excludes Christians with a strong traditional faith.
And, “accepting” (your right to be who you are) others has zero, zip, nada to do with “celebrating” (cheering on) others whom you are willing to leave in peace but do not condone their lifestyle. But public “celebrating” controversial lifetsyles goes beyond “accepting” their freedom and demands the public move to cheering them on. That move is not about “freedom”, it is an attempt to force by law social acceptance that freedom and liberty demand not everyone should have to sign on to.
Very well put.