You really have no clue here whitney. Read and learn.
Then study up what constitutes a deadly threat.
You interpretated his appearance as deadly threat. Black’s Law Dictionary defines deqaly threat as:
A communicated intent to inflict imminent harm or loss on another or on another’s property.
If he was a deadly threat, then why didn’t it happen? When he raised the gun to tap it on the side of the vehicle, why didn’t he fire? And why did he lower the gun to the left side of his body to talk with the shooter? If it was imminent threat, these things wouldn’t have happened. So there is a question as to his intent. And that’s where the civil suit is going if it does.
wy69
“Then study up what constitutes a deadly threat.”
Look it up in Black’s Law Dictionary like I did. From the time the shot left his vehicle until the time he was shot, the gun was never pointed at the shooter. And that alone turns the act of deadly threat into assumption. Let alone why he didn’t do it if it was deadly threat. The opportunity was there but he didn’t.
wy69