Ballistics would prove that...right? They have the bullets.
With cameras everywhere there has to be a video of it if true.
.223 from the assclown. Likely .308 or .338 Lapua or some such from the guy that took him out.
Rumble version of his channel to avoid google products
https://rumble.com/v57hp8j-audio-analysis-is-100-clear-trump-and-crowd-were-shot-at-by-two-separate-pe.html
Some claiming the cameras were moving which caused the difference
Was the long-distance shot from nearby Meriden?
God protected Trump more than once. President Trump could have been shot again when he stood up.
There were 2 sets of security teams firing at the assassin from 2 different locations.
Two shooters and they both missed?
In any case, glad there are some intelligent people outside the gov't who are doing some serious analysis. I still doubt we'll ever know exactly what happened and who all might have been involved.
I followed this channel in the early days of Covid
He was pushing the lab leak theory from day one and explained why
The Fed shooter on the roof behind Trump lost muzzle control two seconds into the firefight. He lost shoulder and scope contact and the rifle was free to wander.
I got a question that might have been discussed but if so, I haven’t seen it... https://x.com/TheMilkBarTV/status/1812731727053488418
This is a real time piece with videos at different angles. Take a look at the crane in the top left quadrant at the 2:12 mark….In this video, it was apparent that a hydraulic line to the crane on the left side of PDJT got hit by a bullet because it was spraying fluid like mad right after the shot (it is already spraying when this video is started). So... we know where the crane was located and we know where PDJT was standing behind the mic. Does a straight line traced from the punctured hydraulic line through where PDJT’s ear was located also go to the roof of the building where Crooks was laying? If not, I think there are two explanations... either the bullet bounced off of something on the way to the crane or there was a second shooter. If it bounced off something, one would assume that it left a mark...
P
I don’t put much weight in audio analysis.
Robert Blakey used audio extensively on the 1979 Committee on Assassinations.
One conclusion was.
Lee Harvey Oswald fired three shots at Kennedy, with the second and third shots hitting the president.
I never was able to swallow that.
Further analysis shows Keith Hernandez by the gravely road.
With the FBI in charge, we will never know the whole truth.
All I can say is the Butler shoot out is getting very complicated very fast.
Wouldn't it be great if the FBI did not corrupt the crime scene? ...if there was a true forensic analysis of all evidence?
Trump on stage was at about the height of the round that hit the right side of the stage from Crook. There were sounds of three distinct rifle reports. Crooks and likely two CS shooters. The fist Counter Sniper sound is semi auto fire in the direction of Crooks to suppress his fire. These do not hit Crooks. While fire suppression is applied the second CS acquires his target precisely for the lights out kill shot and that is the last shot. I do not believe there was a second assassin as implied in the video coming from the inside of the building supposedly occupied by SS tactical team. Others believe someone was on top of the water tower another 200 meters in back of Crooks position. I am hoping the investigation shows that the first burst of fire from CS was just quick return fire in Crooks direction to suppress him and that that initial CS SS officer did not have sufficient time to scope out a precise shot while his partner was doing that simultaneously.