Ballistics would prove that...right? They have the bullets.
They have the bullets.
Yes, *they* do.
Therein lies the rub.
And that right there is the problem isn’t it?
And it’s why we’ll never know….
The FBI is doing the investigation, so I wouldn’t expect that we will ever know. Frankly wouldn’t be surprised if they weren’t involved with the planning and coordination of the events of that day.
The entire FBI organization needs to be shi+canned in 2025.
The 2 men who got critically wounded-—IIRC—abdomen shots==
THEY should have BULLETS from the surgeries to use for evidence.
Trump’s bullet-—where did it end up???
The firefighter who got shot in the head==NO bullet???
AND——IS THERE ALWAYS SUCH SENSITIVE AUDIO EQUIPMENT AT EVERY POLITICAL RALLY ???????????
Well yes they would. If you could trust the ones doing the investigation. And we all know that they cannot be trusted. So we will most likely never know the truth if there was more than one shooter.
“Ballistics would prove that...right? They have the bullets.”
^
This is my field of study—that is being ravaged by Obama-era lawyering.
Let me just say that 223 caliber bullets are prone to damaging impacts which make Forensic Ballistics difficult. Longer pathways improve chances of identification, but fragmentation interferes with determining just how many bullets were collected.